Article View: bit.listserv.confocal
Article #95Re: Visible DNA Stain, Hoechts or DAPI?
From: Johan Wassélius
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 00:00
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 00:00
66 lines
2896 bytes
2896 bytes
Dear fellow Confocalists! A colleague of mine is about to start label nuclei in cultured human cells with DAPI or Hoechts. I have only used DAPI in vivo so I am not of much help to her. However, I though I might help her to get a head start by brain peaking you guys for a handy-dandy recipe for DAPI or Hoecht staining in living or fixed cells, as to incubation time and concentrations and such. Cheers, Johan ______________________________ At 16:06 2000-03-16 -0500, you wrote: >We use DAPI and the nucleoli with all their RNA remain unstained, while the >nuclear DNA stains. However, you need a UV laser. Nina Allen> >Hi Folks, >> >> A colleague wants to stain DNA and view it on >>a visible-wavelength confocal. However, she wants >>a stain that stains only DNA, not RNA and believes >>that all of the visible-wavelength probes that stain >>DNA also stain RNA. [based largely on what's in >>the Molecular Probes catalog]. >> Does anyone know of a visible stain that stains >>DNA either exclusively, or at least more brightly then >>RNA? >> >> Thanks for any suggestions, >>Don >> >>[We sadly do not have a UV confocal here] >> >>Donald M. O'Malley, Ph.D. >>Department of Biology >>414 Mugar Hall >>Northeastern University >>Boston, MA 02115 >>domalle@lynx.neu.edu >>www.omalleylab.neu.edu > > >@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ >Nina Stromgren Allen >Professor, Department of Botany; >Director, Cellular and Molecular Imaging Facility >Box 7612, Department of Botany >North Carolina State University >Raleigh, NC 27695-7612 >Phone: 919-515-8382 (Office), 515-3525 (Lab), 515-2727 (Department Secretary) >Fax: 919-515-3436 > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Johan Wass�lius Wallenberg Retina Center Department of Ophthalmology Lund University Hospital S-221 85 Lund, Sweden Phone: +46-46-17 24 84 Home phone: +46-46-211 99 93 Cell phone: +46-0703-750593 Fax: +46-46-17 27 21 e-mail: johan.wasselius@oft.lu.se ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3.0.3.32.20000317115429.008264b0@pop.usil.lu.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<000301bf8f56$43ae0260$86a6219b@RIBIO300.dac.neu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 114d69,8814867711c1bf59 X-Google-Attributes: gid114d69,public From: Johan Wassélius <johan.wasselius@OFT.LU.SE> Subject: Re: Visible DNA Stain, Hoechts or DAPI? Date: 2000/03/17 Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.20000317115429.008264b0@pop.usil.lu.se> X-Deja-AN: 598703613 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: Confocal Microscopy List <CONFOCAL@LISTSERV.ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU> References: <000301bf8f56$43ae0260$86a6219b@RIBIO300.dac.neu.edu> X-Sender: oft-jws@pop.usil.lu.se Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: 17 Mar 2000 05:58:09 -0500, 127.0.0.1 X-Gateway-From: add_from_switch_to_drobot Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: Confocal Microscopy List <CONFOCAL@LISTSERV.ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by flint.sentex.net id FAA03394 Newsgroups: bit.listserv.confocal