Thread View: bit.listserv.copyediting-l
5 messages
5 total messages
Started by Tim Shock
Fri, 01 Jan 1999 00:00
Anyone out there?
Author: Tim Shock
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 00:00
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 00:00
2 lines
620 bytes
620 bytes
Found this newsgroup among a list; wondering if it's active. Please reply.
Re: Anyone out there?
Author: John Holmes
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 00:00
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 00:00
23 lines
991 bytes
991 bytes
Hello Tim Yes - I've been monitoring this newsgroup for a couple of months, but there's very little activity. I'm a freelance proofreader, copy-editor and indexer so my interest is professional. Feel free to start up an exchange of ideas/information with me - you never know, someone else might join in! All the best John Tim Shock wrote in message <368C83DE.C3CC6794@microserve.net>... >Found this newsgroup among a list; wondering if it's active. Please >reply. >
Re: Anyone out there?
Author: Nick Harman
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 00:00
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 00:00
36 lines
1493 bytes
1493 bytes
Well I just dropped in, I'm a copywriter so perhaps I'm in the wrong place:-) Nick ---------- In article <76sgl2$qjk$1@nclient1-gui.server.virgin.net>, "John Holmes" <john.holmes3@virgin.net> wrote: >Hello Tim > >Yes - I've been monitoring this newsgroup for a couple of months, but >there's very little activity. > >I'm a freelance proofreader, copy-editor and indexer so my interest is >professional. > >Feel free to start up an exchange of ideas/information with me - you never >know, someone else might join in! > > >All the best > >John > > > > >Tim Shock wrote in message <368C83DE.C3CC6794@microserve.net>... >>Found this newsgroup among a list; wondering if it's active. Please >>reply. >> > >
Re: Anyone out there?
Author: John Holmes
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 00:00
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 00:00
194 lines
11502 bytes
11502 bytes
Hello Charlotte Great to hear from you. Sorry for the delay in answering you, but I'm rather busy at the moment and I wanted to do justice to your request. Running a freelance copy-editing business is a somewhat precarious operation. I strongly recommend that you consider all of the points I mention below and then spend time doing plenty of research for yourself before deciding whether it's really for you. How much work is available to you will depend on which country you're in (looking at your timestamp, I suspect that you're in the eastern USA - in which case you should be OK), the subject areas that you can offer and the technical skills you possess. How successful you will be in actually obtaining work and completing it to an acceptable standard will depend on your personality, your marketing strategy and quite a bit of good luck. First: your personality. You need to be observant, meticulous and good at organising information in a logical way. When raw copy reaches you, you will need to read it through thoroughly and understand what the authors are trying to convey, while correcting for spelling, grammar and the publisher's house style as you go. If you feel that the authors have not used the most appropriate language to communicate some particular concept, then you would need re-organise or re-write whole chunks of copy, while maintaining the original meaning (and bearing in mind that authors are easily offended when someone starts messing with their words of wisdom). You need good powers of concentration and have a desire to get things exactly right. You will probably work from home and therefore spend a lot of time alone: no workmates to chat to, no after-hours social life away from home, no escape from your home problems, no getting completely away from your work (although you can deal with all of these if you've a mind to). On the other hand, there are no overbearing bosses, no office politics and no mind-numbing journeys to and from work. You will have to cope with periods lasting weeks when no work comes in and not let it get you down, and yet always be able to shift into a higher gear to deal with complex and/or urgent material all arriving simultaneously. Second: skills. Other than an eye for detail, you need to be good at spotting potential spelling mistakes (you don't necessarily need to be good at spelling yourself, as you can always refer to a dictionary), have a sound grasp of grammar, be conversant with current usage, be able to explain difficult/complicated ideas clearly and have a "feel" for the language (i.e. be able to take a grammatically correct sentence and re-phrase it so that it sounds better). You also have to be able to follow the instructions of the publisher to the letter and, most importantly, know when to stop and leave well alone! I suggest that you join a professional organisation and undertake some of their training programmes - I joined the Society of Freelance Editors and Proofreaders (SFEP) here in the UK and I found their training seminars invaluable. Third: subjects. You will find it easier to obtain commissions from publishers if you specialise in a fairly narrow range of related subjects. I spent 20 years as an analytical chemist before becoming a freelance editor, so I offer chemistry, the pure sciences aimed at a general readership, biotechnology, pharmaceutical science, food science and technology, and the history and development of science and technology - all subject I have either trained in, had work experience of, or have a deep interest in. If you offer too wide a range of subjects, publishers may wonder if you really have the depth of knowledge to follow and correct their material - after all, their reputations depend on the quality of their output and people who are genuine experts in a particular field may refer to these texts. You will have to decide for yourself what subjects best suit you, but as a general rule, the more popular a subject is with the book-buying public, the more rival freelance editors you will have to compete against (obviously, there must have been sufficient people available to edit all those books in the first place). Fourth: your marketing strategy. Find out which publishers currently produce materials in you specialisms. This means visiting bookshops a looking at recently published books, etc. Don't waste your time and effort contacting publishers who never publish in your subjects. Try to have a look at a guide (probably worth buying your own copy) that lists the main publishers and includes their addresses, phone numbers and subject range (in the UK we have the "Writers' and Artists' Yearbook"). Get some decent headed notepaper and business cards printed - this makes you look much more professional. Send off lots of brief letters on your smart notepaper publicising your services, remembering to include your list of specialisms - that way, your target publishers will know that you've bothered to do some research and that you're restricting yourself to areas where you have some knowledge, and so take you much more seriously. In my case, about 90% of publishers never even bothered to reply and most of the rest sent me a bland letter promising to keep my details on file. A small number, maybe only one or two, may reply showing some interest, perhaps saying that they have nothing suitable to offer you at that time, but if you contact them in a month or so, something might be available. Write back thanking them for their letter and agreeing to do as they suggest. Write this up in your diary and make sure that you do contact them at the appropriate time. As you gain more commissions, periodically write back to all the publishers that failed to reply, highlighting the fact that you have successfully completed commissions for other publishers - drive home the point that you are considerably more experienced than you were the last time you wrote to them. Mostly, though, you just have to be patient. I'm currently working on a magazine for a publisher that I first wrote to in April 1998, but didn't reply to me at the time. They telephoned me out of the blue last week and commissioned me - so don't be discouraged. Fifth: equipment. These days you really need a decent computer, telephone answering machine, fax (my computer fax works fine) with its own number, at least one decent printer, a really good general dictionary, a grammar guidebook, an encyclopaedia, a biographical dictionary, a good world atlas, national maps or a gazetteer of place names, various general reference books, and many detailed reference books on your specialisms. I also have a scanner, which can serve as a photocopier, and a colour inkjet printer in addition to my HP LaserJet. Make sure that you have somewhere quiet to work, where you can spread materials around without disturbing anyone else, where you can leave a mess and deal with it the next day if you want, and where no-one will meddle with your stuff. Oh, and make sure you get yourself a decent professional quality chair from an office equipment supplier - there's a lot of sitting down for prolonged periods in the business and a stiff back is best avoided. Sixth: media. I'd say that most copy-editing is still performed on the author's typescript, marking up for the typesetter in pen as you go. Increasingly, publishers are taking text directly from the author's disk and incorporating this into typesetting software. This means that the copy-editing stage is performed directly "on-screen", rather than by scribbling on sheets of paper which then has to be interpreted by someone else as they laboriously re-type the entire text into their particular software. For example, I copy-edit a scientific journal almost entirely on-screen. I load the text from a floppy that the publisher posts to me into MS Word, save the changes that I make back to the file and return it to the journal editor. I've just starting receiving proofreading work via e-mail too: the magazine pages arrive as PDF files which I print out on my LaserJet and then mark up as usual. Seventh: fees. How much you should charge for what you do very much depends on the "going rate" in your region. If you're very expensive but can offer no exceptional service to justify your fees, then you'll price yourself out. If you offer bargain basement rates, then most publishers will think that you're either useless, and this is the only way you can get work, or you're so new that you haven't discovered the appropriate professional rates yet, and you're probably just as inexperienced when it comes to doing the editing too. If you join a professional body, they will advise you on their recommended rates for established members. You may like to start off requesting 5-10% less, just to get your foot in the door, but you should build up to the full rates within 1 to 2 years as you gain experience. If you pitch in too low, then you may find it very difficult building your charges up in later years - you will always be seen as a cheap option and publishers may try to take advantage of you. Remember too that whatever you charge must provide you with a reasonable living after paying all your bills, and cover holiday breaks, sickness, pension provision, taxation, personal insurance and all your business overheads. You may charge for expenses incurred in fulfilling a commission (e.g. postage, packaging or maybe travel costs) as an extra on your invoices, but all of the rest (and probably more that I've forgotten to mention) comes straight out of your hourly fee. Eight: services. It's a good idea to offer a range of related services to publishers. For example, I offer proofreading, copy-editing, indexing, re-writing and re-design. With one enquiry letter I publicise all my services and increases my chances of getting a commission doing something. Once you've proved yourself in one area, publishers may be more willing to try you out in others if the skills necessary are broadly similar. Well, I think I'd better stop here as I've become rather more prolix than I'd intended. I hope this helps. Please do get back to me if anything is unclear or if you'd like more information. Best wishes John Roger and Charlotte Panton wrote in message <369A4D30.900B0D9D@infinet.com>... >Dear John, > >I read your post to this newsgroup. I have been looking for a >copyediting newsgroup for a long time. I found several forums on >communication in which the participants were interested in finding one >also. Also, on misc.business.marketing moderated, they have been >searching for a newsgroup on editors. > >I would be interested in any advise you have on copyediting as a >business. > >Sincerely, > >Charlotte Panton
Re: Anyone out there?
Author: Charlotte Panton
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 00:00
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 00:00
17 lines
1204 bytes
1204 bytes
Thanks for the very good information about your field. I'm not sure which message got through before as I was having trouble with Express News. I've got it fixed now. What I had written was that I had seen inquiries on misc. business.marketing.moderated for such a newsgroup. They were told none exists. Also, I have been monitoring some forums which would be interested in this newsgroup also. Maybe they'll post here in the future. I'll tell them about it. Thanks again for the info. Charlotte Panton
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads