Article View: bit.listserv.devmedia
Article #271MacBride RT Statement
From: Sean O Siochru
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 1997 00:00
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 1997 00:00
389 lines
12030 bytes
12030 bytes
Hi to everyone on the Devmedia list. Attached you will find the MacBride=
Round Table statement from Boulder. Do check out the Website, brought to=
us courtesy of Don Richardson and colleagues.=20
Bye for now,
Sean=20
Ninth MacBride Round Table on Communication=20
BOULDER STATEMENT
The Ninth MacBride Round Table, hosted by the University of Colorado=20
School of Journalism & Mass Communication, was held in Boulder, Colorado,
USA, on 1-2 October 1997. The Round Table was held in association with
the 12th colloquium of the European Institute for Communication and
Culture on Community Citizenship. Most papers are available at the
MacBride Website, at http://tdg.uoguelph.ca/~drichard/macbride/.
Over 50 participants, mainly from the North American academic community,
were in attendance and the program included some 20 papers, workshops, and
two keynote speakers, Steven Bates who spoke on "Realigning Journalism
with Democracy: The Hutchins Commission, Its Times, and Ours," and Saskia
Sassen who spoke of "The State and the New Geography of Power." Community
and alternative media attended in strength, as did critical media analysts,=
=20
and representatives of national and international NGOs. Those present=
shared=20
both an awareness of the great challenges facing us and some optimism,=20
summarised by more than one speaker in Antonio Gramsci's famous words=20
'pessimism of the intellect and optimism of the spirit'.
The MacBride Round Table reflects two historical developments towards the
end of the 20th century: the growing societal influence of privately owned=
media,=20
and a power shift from governments towards civil society. This=
non-governmental=20
platform was established at the end of the 1980s when it became clear that=
the
intergovernmental UN system, particularly UNESCO, was incapable of
supporting the intellectual and political dialogue emanating from the
emancipatory movements of the 1970s, notably the International Commission
for the Study of Communication, chaired by the late Sean MacBride.
THEMES ADDRESSED=20
The Round Table theme, "Global Media and Global Responsibility: A=20
Time to Choose", points to a crucial turning point: Must we acquiesce to=20
total market domination, or can we assert an alternative view? This was=20
explored in three intensive sessions.
The first took a critical look at the New World Information and
Communication Order (NWICO) and its legacy. It was addressed from the
Perspectives of American media ideology, of Latin American traditions, and
generally the developing countries adjusting to the new information age.=20
Secondly, several papers reviewed current trends in mass media around the
world, ranging from journalism in the age of globalisation to the use and
abuse of the concept of Information Society. The third area focused on
alternative and participatory media, reporting several experiments and
studies, and including a video session by Paper Tiger Television's DeeDee=20
Halleck and Michael Eisenmenger.=20
Stephen Bates, literary editor of the Wilson Quarterly, addressed the
gathering on the second day of the Round Table. It is now 50 years since
the Hutchins Commission published its report "Free and Responsible
Press". Dr. Bates reviewed the conditions which led to the setting up of
this unique exercise of reflecting the role of the media in society, the
work of the Commission and the lukewarm, even hostile, reception it met
within the media industry of the day. Round Table participants noted=
similarities
between this US exercise of the 1940s and the global work of the MacBride=20
Commission 30 years later. While the changing times have naturally made=20
some of the Hutchins Commission's analyses and proposals obsolete, many=20
of them remain valid - perhaps even more so than at its time - under the=20
contemporary conditions of global communications.=20
One aspect raised by the Hutchins Commission that has become ever more
central is the need to develop media literacy and media criticism. As=20
observed in a paper by Sakae Ishikawa of Japan, the new communication=20
environment is entering an age of overload, as people become=20
overwhelmed by a flood of information that may or may not be true.=20
A GLOBAL MEDIA MOVEMENT
The Round Table heard how, in the USA, the various elements exist on the
ground to support a new phase of growth in community and alternative
media. Key conditions are already in place, the training capacities, the
facilities, and an active personnel. What is missing, perhaps, is a crucial=
=20
element that could, in practice, bind these together and energise them. =20
An important parallel can be drawn at the international level, where such=20
conditions may be present in greater force.
The various components of an international movement on media and
communications, that can challenge the current neo-liberal orthodoxy, seem
to be emerging. The creation of a global social movement - largely absent
from the NWICO - requires a number of factors, among them a core
constituency of on-the-ground activists who recognise their affinities and
can mobilise in concerted actions; an understanding of the key global
issues of the day and of the arenas in which they are fought out; and the
capacity to get their message out both to natural allies in progressive
movements and to the general public.
While operating at several levels, local, national, and international,
such a movement would work on two broad fronts. On the one hand
alternatives to current homogenised and commodified media must be further
supported, in participative forms, producing a diversity of output - not to=
=20
displace mass media, but to create a truly democratic space in which=
everyone
has the right to participate in whatever active or passive manner they wish.=
=20
On the other hand, the mass media and transnational institutions of
corporate power and domination over world information must be challenged
in their own terms and on their own ground. Public media policy and=20
institutions, too, must be opened out to democratic participation.=20
Some elements of a movement are more clearly present than others. There
is certainly growing activism in alternative media, such as radio, access
television, and internet use, across the world. A long tradition thrives of=
=20
articulate voices raised in criticism of the current state and trends of the=
=20
media, from academia to lobby groups to certain UN Commissions and reports.=
=20
Furthermore, these are beginning to recognise their common cause and=20
build bridges. Within the various strands, national and international=20
organisations are already well established. Nationally, coalitions of=
several
strands of the movement are appearing: The Round Table heard of=20
national organisations in countries as diverse as the USA, Ireland and=20
South Africa that bring together all forms of alternative media and media=20
activists. The creation of such groups as the Platform for Cooperation=20
on Democratisation and Communication in London in 1996 and growing=20
support for the People's Communication Charter, point to a willingness to=20
cooperate across the board, bringing together diverse constituencies in=20
pursuit of a common mission.=20
Indeed, a major outcome of the 9th Round Table was the unanimous
endorsement of the Charter, that will add the Round Table to the select
group of the Charter's 'Founding Parents'. The Third World Network,
AMARC, Vid=E9azimut, the Cultural Environment Movement, WACC and others=20
have already approved the Charter through their respective procedures.
Further evidence of a growing movement can be seen in plans for a series
of major international meetings during 1998, the 50th anniversary of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights.=20
Yet there are also elements that clearly need serious attention if a global
movement of any consequence is to emerge.
Among these are the need for a self reflexive critical capacity on what=20
the movement is about, tackling such basic questions, discussed at
the Round Table, of whether participative media really do empower people
and in what ways; whether civil society organisations and movements=20
can themselves embody the democratic and participative principles they=20
espouse; and what realistic alternative structures and institutions can be=
=20
proposed.=20
Sharing of research results, a deep understanding of the core problems,
and nuanced reflection on their contradictory impact, will be needed if=20
strategic interventions are to be pursued effectively. At the same time,
key issues at international level must be explored in depth, such as the=20
shift away from the UN system towards a trade paradigm in media and=20
communications; and the implications of trends in copyright and intellectual=
=20
property rights.=20
SOME IMMEDIATE TASKS
The Round Table was keenly aware that grand schemes and declarations=20
cannot substitute for action, and many concrete ideas and approaches were=20
raised. An immediate strategy across a set of different fronts is clearly=
=20
needed, and mutual support and coordination among the growing number=20
of initiatives and organisations was seen as critical to ensuring current=
energies
are not dissipated. Participants enthusiastically shared information on=
many=20
activities already underway and proposed collaborative action in others,=
among=20
them:=20
- Research to assess the real impact of alternative media, to explore the
relevance of emerging technologies, and to deepen understanding of=20
activities outside the wealthy countries.
- The building of a broad-based social movement, self-reflective and self-
critical and sustaining a clear common agenda.
- The need for an international non-governmental platform to cover global=20
regulatory agencies (ITU, WTO, etc.) and democratic forms of governance.=20
The Round Table also announced that a book highlighting this intellectual=
and=20
political movement as exemplified by papers presented in recent Round=
Tables,=20
and including the final documents of all the Round Tables, is to be=
published=20
("Toward Equity in Global Communication: MacBride Update," Cresskill, NJ: =
=20
Hampton Press, 1998). A second volume ("International News Monitoring",
Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 1998) will highlight the potential of pooling=
=20
together studies of content analysis in order to create a worldwide system=
=20
of monitoring the performance of the mainstream media, particularly in=
issues=20
of global concern.=20
Boulder, Colorado, USA
October 1997
<color><param>0000,8080,0000</param>Sean O Siochru</color> =09
MacBride Round Table =09
14 Eaton Brae tel: +353 1 272 0739 office=20
Shankill fax: +353 1 2720739 home office
Co. Dublin e-mail: sean@nexus.ie
Ireland http://tdg.uoguelph.ca/~drichard/macbride
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3.0.1.32.19971109130253.006e3fb0@gpo.iol.ie>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 105940,459b26e675dd4a4,start X-Google-Attributes: gid105940,public From: Sean O Siochru <sean@NEXUS.IE> Subject: MacBride RT Statement Date: 1997/11/09 Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19971109130253.006e3fb0@gpo.iol.ie> X-Deja-AN: 288187832 Sender: Media for Development in Democracy <DEVMEDIA@LISTSERV.UOGUELPH.CA> Comments: ******************************************************** X-Sender: nexus2@gpo.iol.ie (Unverified) Newsgroups: bit.listserv.devmedia