Thread View: bit.listserv.devmedia
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Martin Sieg
Wed, 25 Mar 1998 00:00
Software flying south ?
Author: Martin Sieg
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 1998 00:00
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 1998 00:00
100 lines
5400 bytes
5400 bytes
This is of interest and ripe for comment. Martin. >>> FORWARDED from Dr Richard Heeks <mzdid10@FS1.EC.MAN.AC.UK>>>> > FLYING SOFTWARE: Is the Information Society heading > South? > > In 1998, developing countries will export around US$3bn- > worth of computer software to Western markets, making use of > telecommunication networks: a major signal that Information > Society benefits can be global. However, such 'headline > images' are deceptive. Software production retains output, > location and skill skews that provide limited benefits for DCs. > These skews will be difficult to eliminate, but government > action is needed to address them. > > Over the past five years, all DC software exporters worth their > salt have invested in telecommunication links and many are > Internet-connected. The new image projected is one of 'virtual > development' in which clients sitting in the West interact with > software professionals developing packages overseas. The > reality, though, is somewhat different with most software > export contracts involving: > >>A skewed output profile: software packages represent a > tiny proportion of total DC exports. Thus, the Microsoft of the > 21st century is not currently being born in the back streets of > Bangalore. Instead producers in the South provide software > services. > >>A skewed location profile: large amounts of > development work take place at the client's site, i.e. by having > DC software developers fly over to work with the client. > >>A skewed skills profile: most work undertaken by DC > developers is relatively low-skill software construction and > testing, leaving the high-skill tasks of analysis and design > residing in Western hands. > > As a result, much of the US$3bn earned leaves developing > countries to pay for: travel and living allowances of the DC > developers who work at the client site; marketing expenses; > information and communication technology imports used for > DC-based contract components; and profit repatriation by the > many multinationals involved in this trade. > > The dominance of service over package exports can be > explained by the almost insuperable barriers of cost, skills, and > information that exist in the package sector. But why do the > other skews persist? Three factors can be highlighted: > >>The 'Information Superhighway' is not a reality for most > DC users. Fax and email correspondence, not > videoconferencing, remain the backbone of communications. > These mechanisms cannot provide the depth of interaction that > software development requires. > >>Client uncertainty about DC firms' skills, capability and > credibility. To reduce risk, clients choose to retain as much > control as they can over production. This means only > contracting out relatively simple, low-skill tasks, and having > work carried out under their noses. > >>A 'programmer heavy' skills profile in developing > countries, with no shortage of raw recruits but very few > experienced project managers, analysts and designers. > > How can developing countries break out of this 'body shopping > prison'? The spread of global networks will help, but only > addresses the first factor, not the second two. Time will also > help, as individual client-developer relationships move slowly > up a 'trust curve' and uncertainties diminish. But, finally, there > is a role for the state. > > The Department of Defense was a key driver in the creation of > the US software industry, and all subsequent development in > other countries has been state-initiated, state-led or state- > promoted. Selective policy liberalisations - such as removal of > software import tariffs - have a role. However, the elimination > of all state interventions and the free play of market forces will > lead only to the atrophy of local software-related technological > capabilities. > > >From South Africa to Egypt to India to Singapore the story is > the same: building a viable software industry requires > government promotional interventions in financing and > marketing, in skills and infrastructure development, in > procurement, and in the diffusion of best practice. > > REFERENCES: > Heeks, R. (1996) India's Software Industry, Sage Publications > Heeks, R. (forthcoming) Building Software Industries in > Africa, IDPM (University of Manchester) Working Paper > > --------------------------------------------------- > > Dr Richard Heeks, Institute for Development Policy and > Management, Precinct Centre, University of Manchester, > Manchester, M13 9GH, UK > T: +44-161-275-2870 > F: +44-161-273-8829 > E: richard.heeks@man.ac.uk > W: http://www.man.ac.uk/idpm/
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads