Thread View: bit.listserv.devmedia
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Bruce Girard
Tue, 24 Feb 1998 00:00
latin american monitor for press freedom?
Author: Bruce Girard
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 00:00
72 lines
4082 bytes
4082 bytes
The Oppenheimer Report, Miami Herald, Monday, February 22, 1998 Andres Oppenheimer Summit issue: a monitor for press freedom Just when everybody thought that U.S. legislative hurdles to the signing of new free trade agreements would turn the upcoming Summit of the Americas into a monumental bore, a proposal to create a hemispheric freedom of the press monitor may create a semblance of excitement about the meeting. The U.S.-backed idea, first proposed by independent press groups, is being discussed between several governments and the Organization of American States (OAS). It is likely to be announced when Clinton and 33 heads of government of the hemisphere meet at the Santiago, Chile, summit in April. A draft of the summit declaration shown to me last week calls for ``supporting the activities of the [OAS] Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, including giving consideration to additional action measures'' to defend freedom of the press. Clinton administration officials say the draft will be updated with a specific proposal to create a ``special rapporteur'' or ombudsman for freedom of the press, who would investigate unpunished crimes against journalists and issue annual reports on each country's treatment of the press. State Department officials say they would provide funding for the new office. They say an OAS ombudsman would have more political clout than existing press associations and could even take cases to the Inter-American Court of Justice. Granted, the OAS is seen by many in Washington as a retirement home for former Latin American officials, which rarely gets things done. But the organization's decisions are not taken lightly in Latin American capitals. The problem is that U.S. officials want the new job to be held by an independent ombudsman appointed by the seven-member OAS Commission on Human Rights, while commission members would like total control over the new office. U.S. officials say an independent, full-time ombudsman would be more effective than one who reports to the commission, whose members work part time and meet once in a while. OAS officials fear that an independent ombudsman could follow a personal political agenda. And some skeptics wonder whether Mexico, Colombia, Peru and Argentina, where authorities have been criticized for not solving attacks against journalists, would try to silently sabotage the proposed office while publicly celebrating its creation. But independent press groups say an OAS press ombudsman could become an unprecedented tool for freedom of expression, among other things by launching probes into the murders of Argentine photographer Jose Luis Cabezas, Colombia's El Espectador Publisher Guillermo Cano, and Mexico's Diario de Juarez columnist Victor Manuel Oropeza. According to the Inter-American Press Association, 188 Latin American journalists have been killed for their writings during the past nine years. Ninety-five percent of the cases remain unsolved -- enough to keep the future ombudsman busy for a few years. ___________________________________________________ Bruce Girard Boa Agencia Informativa Pulsar Email: bgirard@pulsar.org.ec http://www.comunica.org/pulsar Fono/Fax: +593-2-501180 Fax en Canada: +1-514-221-2009 Av. Atahualpa 333, Casilla 17-08-8489, Quito, Ecuador
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads