🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <Pine.3.88.9402221635.A28930-0100000@mallard>, David W Tapley
<tapled1@MAIL.AUBURN.EDU> wrote:
> This is a good idea.  Many of the features we want to see in
> EndNote can be achieved by using programs such as Quickeys.
> This is especially useful for features that may be needed
> by only a few of us.  Remember, more features come at the
> cost of more code, which likely means more bugs and
> incompatibilities, as well as a slower running program.

surely this does not follow. if programs had built into them the
navigational capibilities god intended them to have, there would be no need
for programs such as quickeys. and even a fine product such as endnotes has
incompatibilities (make sure you use quickeys and not macromaker with
endnotes). lastly, as far as "more features implies more code" is
concerned, the features and benefits of quickeys most certainly have a
concommitant cost in cpu cycles, RAM and disk space.

-- 
-- bob pasker
-- brown u., dept. of history
-- rbp@brown.edu
--