Why the upgrade

Article View: bit.listserv.endnote

Article #1082

Back to bit.listserv.endnote Previous Next

#1082

From: Steve Waechter
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 1994 21:57

10 lines
1448 bytes

I called Niles & Associates about the interim release which allegedly makes EN+
more compatible with WordPerfect 3.0.  The tech support person said, however,
that this interim release did not affect the INability of EN+ to exchange the
reference code for a complete reference INSIDE the WP 3.0 footnote.  So, I'm
left wondering--why the upgrade?  Can somebody enlighten me as to what the
interim release does as far as EN+ and WP 3.0 are concerned?  Thanks.

Steve Waechter
swaechter@utmem1 (bitnet)
swaechter@utmem1.utmem.edu (internet)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <01H98B3FDI0291VS5J@UTMEM1.UTMEM.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!news2.cac.psu.edu!news.cac.psu.edu!psuvm!auvm!UTMEM1.BITNET!SWAECHTER

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 107cb9,1acbb05e128f4c46,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid107cb9,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-02-23 13:57:08 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!news2.cac.psu.edu!news.cac.psu.edu!psuvm!auvm!UTMEM1.BITNET!SWAECHTER
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.endnote
Return-Path: <@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU,@UCSBVM.BITNET:owner-endnote@UCSBVM.BITNET>
Return-Path: <@UCSBVM.BITNET:SWAECHTER@UTMEM1.BITNET>
X-Envelope-to: ENDNOTE@UCSBVM.bitnet
X-VMS-To: IN%"ENDNOTE@UCSBVM.bitnet"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Message-ID: <01H98B3FDI0291VS5J@UTMEM1.UTMEM.EDU>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 1994 15:57:08 -0600
Sender: EndNote/EndLink Users Forum <ENDNOTE@UCSBVM.BITNET>
From: Steve Waechter <SWAECHTER@UTMEM1.BITNET>
Subject: Why the upgrade
Lines: 9