Article View: bit.listserv.endnote
Article #12Re: What field-labelled format is most general?
From: Uwe Baumert
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 00:00
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 00:00
30 lines
1740 bytes
1740 bytes
In article <r-larkin-1412951630230001@room-11-660.inhs.uiuc.edu>, r-larkin@uiuc.edu (Ronald P. Larkin) wrote: > As EndNote users, we can exchange references pretty easily, thanks to > the way Niles has implemented their database format. However if I want to > make references (in this case, scientific references) available to the > maximum number of miscellaneous researchers, what if any format or formats > are closest to a universal standard? Is Refer format readable by lots of > other bibliographic database programs? What format is more widely > readable? > > Finally, where should I ask this question to get non-EndNote users? > > Thanks, Ron Larkin > -- > Ron Larkin (r-larkin@uiuc.edu) > Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign IL 61820 All bibliographic programs support refer format- Endnote for example can import refer without endlink. The same is for BibTeX (there is a perl script for conversion), Reference Manager, Refs etc. Uwe Baumert -- Uwe Baumert Institute for General Zoology and Genetics University of Muenster Tel.: +49 251 834675 Schlossplatz 5 Fax: +49 251 834723 D-48149 Muenster, Germany e-mail: baumert@uni-muenster.de
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<tiedtke-2012951321010001@pbio16.uni-muenster.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<r-larkin-1412951630230001@room-11-660.inhs.uiuc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 107cb9,e25827a14c05d5c1 X-Google-Attributes: gid107cb9,public From: tiedtke@vnwz00.uni-muenster.de (Uwe Baumert) Subject: Re: What field-labelled format is most general? Date: 1995/12/20 Message-ID: <tiedtke-2012951321010001@pbio16.uni-muenster.de> X-Deja-AN: 122730587 references: <r-larkin-1412951630230001@room-11-660.inhs.uiuc.edu> organization: University of Muenster newsgroups: bit.listserv.endnote