Article View: bit.listserv.endnote
Article #1536EndNote+ vs. Papyrus...
From: CGALT
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 1993 02:06
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 1993 02:06
37 lines
2414 bytes
2414 bytes
Message-ID: <268t7v$k32@garuda.csulb.edu> Newsgroup: bit.listserv.endnote Organization: Cal State Long Beach Anyone out there had sufficient experience with EndNote+ (PC version only) AND Papyrus (also DOS/PC, and someone was right, i don't think they've come out with the Mac version 'yet') to be able to give a reasonable comparision of features and performance of both?? I'm a currently loyal papyrus user, but teach a class this term in which I hope to be able to point out pros and cons of a few programs. To my knowledge, EN and Pap are, for the money,about the best, and I know some of the features of EN for Mac (and they sound attractive, to be sure). I went Papyrus largely because itexisted for DOS machines at the time (about 3 years ago). So I do know Papyrus pretty well now, would like comparative info on EndNote I could pass on to my students so that they could make a good decision... Thanks! charles Galt galt@csulb.edu or this group Anyone out there had sufficient experience with EndNote+ (PC version only) AND Papyrus (also DOS/PC, and someone was right, i don't think they've come out with the Mac version 'yet') to be able to give a reasonable comparision of features and performance of both?? I'm a currently loyal papyrus user, but teach a class this term in which I hope to be able to point out pros and cons of a few programs. To my knowledge, EN and Pap are, for the money,about the best, and I know some of the features of EN for Mac (and they sound attractive, to be sure). I went Papyrus largely because itexisted for DOS machines at the time (about 3 years ago). So I do know Papyrus pretty well now, would like comparative info on EndNote I could pass on to my students so that they could make a good decision... Thanks! charles Galt galt@csulb.edu or this group
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<f.89.1858.0N7531FC@BEACH.CSULB.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!rrz.uni-koeln.de!unidui!math.fu-berlin.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!csus.edu!netcom.com!netcomsv!aquila!CGALTShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 107cb9,82736a28639d90c1 X-Google-Attributes: gid107cb9,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-09-07 12:01:17 PST Newsgroups: bit.listserv.endnote Subject: EndNote+ vs. Papyrus... From: CGALT@BEACH.CSULB.EDU Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!rrz.uni-koeln.de!unidui!math.fu-berlin.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!csus.edu!netcom.com!netcomsv!aquila!CGALT Distribution: world Message-ID: <f.89.1858.0N7531FC@BEACH.CSULB.EDU> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 93 20:06:00 -0600 Organization: Aquila BBS - Aurora, IL - 820-8344 Lines: 39