🚀 go-pugleaf

>Are QUED/M and Nisus macros interchangable?  This seems quite
>likely since they are from the same company.  If so could you please
>post your macros at the Endnote ftp site (magic.ucsb.edu)?
>Users of this mail list are academics may want to contact
>Nisus Software directly to purchase either QUED/M or Nisus
>since they have an academic discount program.  Last year I
>got Nisus for $95.
>
>Tom Ritch
>UCLA

As far as I know, the macros are not interchangeable.  QUED/M is much more
sophisticated than any word processor I have seen (though I havn't seen
Nisus).  To run the QUED/M macros you need QUED/M.  This is because of the
complexity of the find/search/replace capabilites of QUED/M.  Here, for
example, are some of the lines of my macro to change Harvard tagged records
into Refer format for import into EndNote:

Change "%START:" "%2" "gat"
Change "%HOLLIS#:" "% F" "gat"
Change "%FORMAT:" "%0" "gat"
Change "%YEAR:" "%D" "gat"
Change "%AUTHOR:" "%2" "gat"
Change "%TITLE:" "%T" "gat"
Change "%EDITION:" "%N" "gat"
Change "%PUB. INFO:" "%I" "gat"
Change "%PUBLISHED IN:" "%2" "gat"
Change "%DESCRIPTION:" "%P" "gat"
Change "%SUMMARY:" "%X" "gat"
Change "%SERIES:" "%S" "gat"
Change "%FREQUENCY:" "%O" "gat"
Change "%NOTES:" "%O" "gat"
Change "%SUBJECTS:" "%K" "gat"
Change "%LOCATION:" "%2" "gat"
Change "%END:" "%2" "gat"
Change "%NUMBERS:" "%F" "gat"
Change "%AUTHORS:" "%A" "gat"

The macro is more complex since it calls upon several sub-routines to
finish the clean-up.  I hope this helps.  Chris.

***********************************************************
Chris Brown    :)
Olin Library Reference Dept.
Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Internet: ccb3@cornell.edu
America Online:  CBrown1
Compuserve: 76675,3543
***********************************************************