Article View: bit.listserv.endnote
Article #2010Re: Styles on the FTP site
From: Tom Ritch
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1993 20:19
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1993 20:19
22 lines
1686 bytes
1686 bytes
>Any pros and cons to combining the biology and medical directories? Con: There are *many* journals under each of these headings. Combined, there will be a huge list to scroll through since eventually this archive will have a Style for each of them. By leaving the directories separate it will be easier to find what you want. To me it seems more appropriate to keep the evolution and environmental journals together with the other biology stuff. Pro: Biologists working in medicine (which is a lot of people) could find most of what they need in one directory. With the announced plan to put each Style in its own file in the archive, I think that breaking them into more subdirectories is a better idea. From my own perspective as a biochemist/microbiologist/ molecular biologist working on non-medical problems it might make more sense to combine the biology and chemistry directories - not that I am suggesting that. I can search two directories easily enough. Tom
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9306152019.AA15859@nimbus.seas.ucla.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!SEAS.UCLA.EDU!RITCHShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 107cb9,ff7a9ba9f3ab0e0c X-Google-Attributes: gid107cb9,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-06-15 13:27:36 PST Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!SEAS.UCLA.EDU!RITCH Return-Path: <@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU:owner-endnote@UCSBVM.BITNET> Message-ID: <9306152019.AA15859@nimbus.seas.ucla.edu> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.endnote Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1993 13:19:58 -0700 Sender: EndNote/EndLink Users Forum <ENDNOTE@UCSBVM.BITNET> From: Tom Ritch <ritch@SEAS.UCLA.EDU> Subject: Re: Styles on the FTP site Lines: 22