Re: Word 5 compatibility

Article View: bit.listserv.endnote

Article #2321

Back to bit.listserv.endnote Previous Next

#2321

From: Ian
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1993 15:20

14 lines
1488 bytes

Dear Avi,
I concur with Herbert Burkert's comment. For an upgrade, 45 pounds is a lot of
money, and the price hike is way in excess of anything justified by customs and
postage (!) I agree that Word 5 compatibility represents considerable
programming investment and is extremely useful - I wouldn't be upgrading if
that was the case - but for less money I can upgrade Word 4 to 5.1. Now that's
a serious upgrade.

I have to say I'm very pleased with EN+, and with the level of help given
through this list - but _this_ is where the help is to be found: the UK
distributor could tell me very little about upgrades to v1.2, let alone 1.3.
Yours,
Ian Stevenson
Cambridge

Technical Details

Message-ID: <A757159CCF01F470@UK.AC.CAMBRIDGE.PHOENIX>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!uknet!pipex!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!news.ysu.edu!psuvm!auvm!PHOENIX.CAMBRIDGE.AC.UK!IRS12

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 107cb9,edcf690ca11aa66
X-Google-Attributes: gid107cb9,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-04-16 03:56:25 PST
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!uknet!pipex!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!news.ysu.edu!psuvm!auvm!PHOENIX.CAMBRIDGE.AC.UK!IRS12
Return-Path: <@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU:ENDNOTE@UCSBVM.BITNET>
Via:         UK.AC.CAM.PHX; 15 APR 93 16:20:19 BST
Message-ID: <A757159CCF01F470@UK.AC.CAMBRIDGE.PHOENIX>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.endnote
Date:         Thu, 15 Apr 1993 16:20:21 BST
Sender:       EndNote/EndLink Users Forum <ENDNOTE@UCSBVM.BITNET>
From:         Ian <irs12@PHOENIX.CAMBRIDGE.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: Word 5 compatibility
In-Reply-To:  -unspecified-
Lines: 14