Article View: bit.listserv.endnote
Article #2507Re: electronic publishing of bibliographies
From: jqj
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1993 23:22
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1993 23:22
18 lines
1562 bytes
1562 bytes
>I am doubtful that you can legally, as you say, "if you get hold of an >electronic database, you can buy a copy, copy the records into your own >database (using your own format), and sell it!" Especially, where abstracts >or other brain work is involved. Yes, but I'm most interested in the cases (1) where abstracts are NOT included, and the argued originality is figuring out the formatting rules, but (2) where fair use is not applicable for some reason (e.g. someone copies a citation from a citation database which enhances the saleability of the book she is writing). Note that US courts have been fairly strict about the "subset" clause. I haven't ever heard of a valid subset more than 5% of the total work, for instance. Any thoughts on this?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9302042322.AA24250@phloem.uoregon.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!NS.UOREGON.EDU!JQJShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 107cb9,c3a07b5feee8cd2
X-Google-Attributes: gid107cb9,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-02-04 15:22:38 PST
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!NS.UOREGON.EDU!JQJ
Message-ID: <9302042322.AA24250@phloem.uoregon.edu>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.endnote
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1993 15:22:38 PST
Sender: EndNote/EndLink Users Forum <ENDNOTE@UCSBVM.BITNET>
From: jqj@NS.UOREGON.EDU
Subject: Re: electronic publishing of bibliographies
In-Reply-To: Message from mackaay@droit.umontreal.ca,
dated 4 Feb 93 17:49:53 EST.
<9302042250.AA21423@phloem.uoregon.edu>
Lines: 18