🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <398fi4$5rn@portal.gmu.edu>, ralexand@mason1.gmu.edu (Roger T
Alexander) wrote:

> Joseph B. Stanford (stanford@MSSCC.MED.UTAH.EDU) wrote:
> : EndNote: cheaper, easier interface, adequate for most things though I
> : haven't tried to put references in footnotes, etc. which has been the focal
> : point for some problems discussed on this list.  With the most recent
> : upgrade, EndNote Mac has apparently acquired some of the things that I
> : liked about Ref Man: global editing capability, and lists of keywords and
> : authors
> : Ref Man: more powerful, had better reference import utilities but that may
> : have changed with new versions of EndLink.  has MAJOR LIMITATION that you
> : can have ONLY ONE large library (only one library over about 250-300
> : references)
> 
> I'm in the process of changing from EndNOte+ to Reference Manager Pro
> for Windows (yes, Windows!).
Four questions about RefMan Pro:
(1)  How was import from Endnote+? - easy?  difficult?  How much information
     did you lose?
(2)  What versions of which wordprocessors did it support?
(3)  Is there a MAC version as well?
(4)  What about network/multiuser access?

As you might guess from the above, I am not completely satisfied Endnote
user....

                     Adrian

-- 
Adrian Goldman, Ph. D.            |Phone:    intl+358-(9)21-6338029
Group Leader,                     |FAX:      intl+358-(9)21-6338000
Macromolecular Structures,        |Internet: Goldman@Ala.Btk.Utu.Fi
Centre for Biotechnology,         |          Goldman@Hippo.Btk.Utu.Fi     
P. L. 123,                        | Bitnet:  AGoldman@Finabo.Bitnet      
FIN-20521 Turku, Finland.         |