Article View: bit.listserv.endnote
Article #402Re: Windows version
From: Kimberly Mattingly/Technical Sup...
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 1994 19:11
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 1994 19:11
44 lines
3268 bytes
3268 bytes
I want to respond to several comments and questions posted recently regarding the Windows version. As you know, the Windows project is taking us much longer than we expected. We had intended to ship the program during the first half of 1994, but failed to meet that deadline. First of all, I want to apologize for the delay. I know that there are a lot of people out there who have been waiting for a long time and we are truly sorry that we cannot deliver the program earlier. I think that we made a mistake by giving out an expected release date. Our projection was based on our development experience on DOS and Mac, and we were convinced at that time that weUd be able to meet the deadline. We were wrong. Windows has proved to be a very tricky development environment. Indeed, weUve been humbled. So when is the Windows version going to be released? We have two top programmers working on it full time. We have a working version that we hope to turn into a beta version, but feel that we shouldnUt repeat the mistake of giving out a date. The truth is that although things look pretty rosy right now, the developmnt may still take us longer than we expect. About Microsoft Word 6.0 for Windows. Understandably, users want the current program to be directly compatible with this word processor. The thing to realize, however, is that a RpatchS that will make our DOS program read and write Word 6 documents is a programming task of at least six months (IUm giving out time estimates again...) So do we take one of our Windows programmers off the Windows project to develop an interim DOS solution that will delay the Windows version even more? It was a tough decision, but we decided not to do this, but instead, apply all of our resources to developing a Windows version that will be compatible with Word 6. (Some technical background about the last paragraph for those who are interested: we canUt develop Word 6 compatibility for both DOS and Windows at the same time, since the Word 6 file format is an OLE document. In order to read and write Word 6 documents directly, a program must incorporate OLE program elements which are not available for DOS applications.) I hope that at least one fact is clear: we are fully committed to Windows. We are working hard to get out a really good piece of software and we are very excited about what we have achieved so far. I realize that all this is not very satisfactory for someone whoUs been waiting for so long, but I thought you still might be interested to know where things stand. Richard Niles President
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<199410111911.MAA18443@well.sf.ca.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!news.dell.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!WELL.SF.CA.US!nilesincShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 107cb9,3168a3507836019d X-Google-Attributes: gid107cb9,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-11 16:08:45 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!news.dell.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!WELL.SF.CA.US!nilesinc Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Newsgroups: bit.listserv.endnote Message-ID: <199410111911.MAA18443@well.sf.ca.us> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 1994 12:11:20 -0700 Sender: EndNote/EndLink Users Forum <ENDNOTE@UCSBVM.ucsb.edu> From: Kimberly Mattingly/Technical Support <nilesinc@WELL.SF.CA.US> Subject: Re: Windows version Lines: 43