Article View: bit.listserv.endnote
Article #486Re: Discussion vs citation in fns.
From: Denis Chabot
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 1994 15:11
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 1994 15:11
31 lines
2343 bytes
2343 bytes
>I'm writing a short book with lots of footnotes, some of which are just >citations and some of which are small elaborations on something in the >text. I'd like the elaborations to go at the bottom of the page, and I'd >like the citations to go at the end of the book. >Tom Tom, I am in science, and for us footnotes and references are almost always distinguished in the manner you wish to accomplish. With Word 5.1 and the plug-in, it is indeed easy to accomplish, at least if you do not require that bibliographic citations use numbers (I'll return to this in a moment). Thus, if you don't mind that bibliographic citations appear in the text as some variant of the "author, date" type, you do the following: 1) for your discussion/elaboration footnotes, you use Word footnotes 2) for you bibliographic citations, you insert EndNote citations in the text, and tell the plugin that you want your bibliography at the end of the document (this is the default I think). As far as Word is concerned, your references are not footnotes. The one complication I mentioned earlier is if you require citation numbers instead of "author-date in brackets". Using the method just defined, you would have two parallel numbering schemes (and thus chaos from the reader's point of view) unless you do not use numbers for the true footnotes. Feel free to write to me at the email address below if I did not make myself clear. Denis Chabot d_chabot@IML1.IML.DFO.CA
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<01HJ9UFKCHK2001BGV@BIONET.bio.dfo.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!news.cc.swarthmore.edu!psuvax1!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!MR.DFO.CA!D_CHABOTShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 107cb9,eee776b6c36eedd3 X-Google-Attributes: gid107cb9,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-09 07:11:40 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!news.cc.swarthmore.edu!psuvax1!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!MR.DFO.CA!D_CHABOT Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Newsgroups: bit.listserv.endnote X-VMS-To: BIONET::IN%"ENDNOTE@UCSBVM.ucsb.edu" X-VMS-Cc: D_CHABOT MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Message-ID: <01HJ9UFKCHK2001BGV@BIONET.bio.dfo.ca> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 1994 11:11:40 -0400 Sender: EndNote/EndLink Users Forum <ENDNOTE@UCSBVM.ucsb.edu> From: Denis Chabot <D_CHABOT%AM%iml3@MR.DFO.CA> Subject: Re: Discussion vs citation in fns. Lines: 30