🚀 go-pugleaf

A while back I created a style with 15 reference types, all based on a
custom import filter. I've now realized that that all the styles were not
needed, and I've now got it down to two custom styles, with many of the
standard custom styles. After tyring to merge different libaries from
different people at a couple of conferences, I can say that I hope that
you would try to fit the styles into the standard list, and if you can't,
then add one. At least try to keep the same positions for all items, ie
books in books, and journals in journals.
I'd like to see a couple of standard formats, on which styles are based.
This way when you move a library, all refs revert to the standard format,
until someone adds the new references.
dave valentine
 >On Wed, 31 Aug 1994, Kimberly Mattingly/Technical
Support wrote: > > A. Kevin Reinhart of Dartmouth wrote:
> >
> >     Am I correct in understanding the manual: There is no way to add
> >     to the
> >     absolute number of Reference types (which is 15)? I have more
> >     types of
> The maximum number of references types in EndNote is 16. There is no way to
> add more than 16 reference types in EndNote. Keep in mind that you can
> delete any number of the supplied reference types that you will not use, and
> replace them with reference types that you need.