What field-labelled format is most general?

Article View: bit.listserv.endnote

Article #6

Back to bit.listserv.endnote Previous Next

From: Ronald P. Larkin
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 1995 00:00

14 lines
1051 bytes

  As EndNote users, we can exchange references pretty easily, thanks to
the way Niles has implemented their database format.  However if I want to
make references (in this case, scientific references) available to the
maximum number of miscellaneous researchers, what if any format or formats
are closest to a universal standard?  Is Refer format readable by lots of
other bibliographic database programs?  What format is more widely
readable?

  Finally, where should I ask this question to get non-EndNote users?

Thanks, Ron Larkin
-- 
Ron Larkin (r-larkin@uiuc.edu)
Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign IL 61820

Technical Details

Message-ID: <r-larkin-1412951630230001@room-11-660.inhs.uiuc.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 107cb9,e25827a14c05d5c1,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid107cb9,public
From: r-larkin@uiuc.edu (Ronald P. Larkin)
Subject: What field-labelled format is most general?
Date: 1995/12/14
Message-ID: <r-larkin-1412951630230001@room-11-660.inhs.uiuc.edu>
X-Deja-AN: 122191214
organization: Illinois Natural History Survey
newsgroups: bit.listserv.endnote