🚀 go-pugleaf

No reponse from tech support in a couple of days, so I thought I'd throw my
query into space:

     I am in the process of revising a textbook on a Mac (Word 5.1a).  The
last edition was just en+ with the [] citation markers.  Much of the
revision involves adding updated refs, while retaining many of the old
refs.

     Here's the question:  Do I simply ignore the plug-in module and use
en+ the old way or is there some easy means (like a global replace) to
change all the old [] citation markers to the fancy new citation markers?
There are far too many of the old citations that will remain unchanged to
make it worthwhile to manually change each of the refs in the text.  Has
anyone encountered and dealt with this problem?  Sorry if this is an old
problem, as I just found out about enug.

Thanks!
Hugh

\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Hugh Foley
Department of Psychology
Skidmore College
Saratoga Springs, NY 12866
(518) 581-7400 x2333
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\