Re: Rescanning papers with different database?

Article View: bit.listserv.endnote

Article #736

Back to bit.listserv.endnote Previous Next

#736

From: L.M. Wiedemann
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 1994 16:15

8 lines
1073 bytes

Mark A. Saper (saper@UMICH.EDU) wrote:
: If certain citations in a paper are not resolved on an initial scan with one
: database to be able to rescan the paper with a different database.  I keep my
: databases separated by overall topic.

Not really a good idea as the numbering wouldn't be correct, for example.
Better to have one database and use keywords and quickfind set to keywords
and then find to see one topic at a time.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2tptqt$70h@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!uknet!daresbury!s-crim1!mblmw

References: <AA25D380@elmo.biop.umich.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 107cb9,cdbebe4a39fa44fb
X-Google-Attributes: gid107cb9,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-06-16 09:20:59 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!uknet!daresbury!s-crim1!mblmw
From: mblmw@s-crim1.dl.ac.uk (L.M. Wiedemann)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.endnote
Subject: Re: Rescanning papers with different database?
Date: 16 Jun 1994 16:15:25 GMT
Organization: SERC Daresbury Lab, Warrington, U.K.
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <2tptqt$70h@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
References: <AA25D380@elmo.biop.umich.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: s-crim1.dl.ac.uk
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Reply to Parent Message