🚀 go-pugleaf

>>I always use Anon in the author field.  This is handy as it usually
appears
>>at the top of the library file.  It's easy enough to edit out of the final
>>bibliography.
>
>I want to use up a little bandwidth to second, strongly, Dr. Cummins's
>suggestion here.
>
>The problem with the solution advocated by Niles & Co. is that it means
that
>one would have to make an "anonymous" reference types corresponding to all
of
>the non-anonymous types. This is a lousy solution, particularly since there
is
>such a limited number of concurrent reference types. If I have anonymous
>articles, sections of books, books, etc., etc., creating a new "anonymous"
>type for each one is a major pain.

Dear John N.,

I agree with Jim Cummins in that we need to find a better solution to the
anonymous works problem in EndNote. However, the solution I advocated
addresses the initial question from John Bealle of having the titles of
anonymous works sort with the authors of the other references. This is the
best solution that we can offer that addresses this problem.

Sincerely,
Kimberly Mattingly
EndNote Technical Support

Niles & Associates, Inc.    Internet:  nilesinc@well.sf.ca.us
800 Jones St.               telephone: 1 (510) 559-8592,
Berkeley CA 94710           fax:       1 (510) 559-8683