🚀 go-pugleaf

Steve Waechter wrote:

>I called Niles & Associates about the interim release which allegedly makes
EN+
>more compatible with WordPerfect 3.0.  The tech support person said,
however,
>that this interim release did not affect the INability of EN+ to exchange
the
>reference code for a complete reference INSIDE the WP 3.0 footnote.  So,
I'm
>left wondering--why the upgrade?  Can somebody enlighten me as to what the
>interim release does as far as EN+ and WP 3.0 are concerned?  Thanks.

WordPerfect changed the file format for WP 3.0 -- earlier versions of
EndNote couldn't read the files at all.  That's what the upgrade does:
provide basic compatibility and the ability to format bibliographies in the
new version.

I'm sorry that we could not support footnotes: it's on our list for future
versions.  We're also looking into better ways to interact with all word
processors, so we don't have to rewrite our formatting every time a new
version of each word processor comes out.  Part of that interaction will
probably include scanning and formatting footnotes.

Yours,

Avi Rappoport
EndNote Technical Support

Niles & Associates, Inc.      Internet:  nilesinc@well.sf.ca.us

2000 Hearst Ave, Suite 200    telephone: 1 (510) 649-8176,
Berkeley CA 94709             fax:       1 (510) 649-8179

After March 1, 1994:   800 Jones St.
                       Berkeley, CA 94710