Thread View: bit.listserv.endnote
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Tom Ritch
Thu, 10 Jun 1993 23:20
Re: biology styles
Author: Tom Ritch
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1993 23:20
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1993 23:20
28 lines
2188 bytes
2188 bytes
I think guidelines for both the Styles and the Journal abbreviations are a good idea. I also don't feel 100% confident that my Styles are correct, but I assume that if errors are found either by an Endnote user or by a journal editor, the discoverer of the error will post the correction. For journal abbreviations, I wonder how many different conventions there are on the "correct" abreviations. For example, if I recall correctly, the abbreviations used by Nature are different from those used by Cell. Does anyone know if this is correct, and if so, what the basis is for deciding how to abbreviate journal names? A second area in which conventions should be established is the format for posting information at magic.ucsb.edu. Posting each style individually would allow easy updating for corrections, and eliminate downloading things you don't need. But Styles are very small files, especially when compressed, and maybe it's easier to download them all in one transfer. A similar question concerns compression. Should we (Mac users) send Stuffed or Compacted and binhexed files, and should they be self-extracting? I favor not self-extracting, with the note describing the archiving and retrieval procedures telling where on Internet tools such as Stuffit Expander or Compactor may be found. It seems I recall that Mac and IBM versions of Enote can directly use the same libraries. Is this also true for Styles? Tom Ritch University of California, Los Angeles
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads