Thread View: bit.listserv.endnote
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Julie Solomon
Thu, 17 Jun 1993 20:06
Re: "edition" reference type
Author: Julie Solomon
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1993 20:06
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1993 20:06
22 lines
1980 bytes
1980 bytes
Avi Rappoport wrote: > > Julie Solomon writes > >2. Related problem. If I decide to cite an edition under the name of > >the editor, their is no place for the author. The "edited book" reference > >type seems to be designed only for collections of essays. > > Our Book Section reference type is what you want if there's a specific > author for a section. Edited Book is for the entire work (I realize that > these aren't cited all that often). Yes. But I am talking about citing a whole book (for example a novel, the complete works of an author, sometimes also a work of criticism) which was written say last century and has been re-edited more recently. It is easy if I wish to cite under the original author. (apart from the separate date issue - see number 1 of my original query.) However it is often more appropriate to list such works under the editor's name if it is their particular editorial choices that are pertinent to the discussion. I tried "Book section" early on - but of course it comes up in quotation marks instead of underlined. Julie Solomon
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads