Thread View: bit.listserv.endnote
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by Marc Bizer
Thu, 04 Mar 1993 14:57
Re: need for upgrades
Author: Marc Bizer
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1993 14:57
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1993 14:57
11 lines
1237 bytes
1237 bytes
>Or rather, why is he asking for change for the
>sake of change, which is apparently what he wants. The fact that the
>competition is changing doesn't mean that EndNote needs change. If
>there are specific features you want, ask for them; if it ain't broke,
>don't fix it.
I'm not asking for change for the sake of change. I've posted my requests
for new features just like everyone else, and I won't bore you all with
repeats here. However, I feel that there are many significant improvements
to be added.
--Marc Bizer
Re: need for upgrades
Author: Stuart E. Strand
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1993 20:56
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1993 20:56
18 lines
1813 bytes
1813 bytes
I'll cheerfully second both Marc Bizer's call for upgrades and improvements and the comments of others that the Word module was a significant upgrade. I will also compliment Avi on her courteous attention to our suggestions and helpful suggestions for specific problems. I'll also take this opportunity to repeat a call for more efficient indexing of large Endnote databases. There is an explosion in access to the literature. If your personal bibliography isn't at 10,000 yet, it won't be long. I am sure that the folks at Niles want Endnote to be a useful tool for those of us with really big files. I am curious: How about a polling of the size of the bibiographic databases of those who read this group? Mine is about 10,000. I use Quickindex of all fields. //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// / Stuart Strand, Univ.Washington sstrand@u.washington.edu / / AR-10, Seattle WA 98195 206-543-5350 uunet: beaver!milton!sstrand / ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Re: need for upgrades
Author: John G Norman
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1993 04:27
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1993 04:27
30 lines
1707 bytes
1707 bytes
In article <sstrand-040393125913@128.95.36.218> sstrand@u.washington.edu (Stuart E. Strand) writes: >I'll also take this >opportunity to repeat a call for more efficient indexing of large Endnote >databases. There is an explosion in access to the literature. If your >personal bibliography isn't at 10,000 yet, it won't be long. I am sure >that the folks at Niles want Endnote to be a useful tool for those of us >with really big files. >I am curious: How about a polling of the size of the bibiographic >databases of those who read this group? Mine is about 10,000. I use >Quickindex of all fields. I'm at 3080; quickfind only on the key fields. Almost none of the entries are from CD-ROMs or on-line sources; I've typed most of them in myself. Occasionally I download records from Harvard's catalog (hollis.harvard.edu) which can mail records in a format that's pretty easy to translate into REFER format. John G. Norman jgn+@osu.edu
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads