Article View: bit.listserv.envbeh-l
Article #1139edra bashing
From: Jack L Nasar
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1992 14:30
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1992 14:30
32 lines
2757 bytes
2757 bytes
Thanks Robert for raising an interesting and relevant questions. Like Richard, I am an EDRA and Div. 34 regular. And I am frustrated with the quality of papers at EDRA, and frustrated with the case studies, post occupancy evaluations and descriptions of programming, which seem to add little to the knowledge base. Interestingly, though, I have heard EDRA attendees complain that conferences are overrun with environmental psychology. In a related matter, APA also has quality problems and problems with lack of science. (Consider for example this year's APA's presentations by Peter Eisenman & Philip Johnson who have made a point of designing uncomfortable buildings). Many scientists have fled APA for regional conferences or other organization which places more emphasis on science. While I am frustrated with EDRA I continue to go because through all the garbage I usually find some jewels, one or two new ideas. They may come from formal sessions, informal discussion, and they may come from designers, psychologists or others. Similarly, I find I get valuable feedback on my own work from this diverse audience. Looking back to the original EDRAs, it looks like the conferences included basic research, applied research, evaluation research, and applications of research, the same as now. And while the sessions and conferences can be frustrating, I see a strength in multidisciplinarity. That is part of what makes EDRA and Div. 34 unique and valuable. Another part is the shared commitment to making environments better for people. My question for EDRA is why we don't try a different kind of conference. For example, Paul Cherulnik suggested that instead of the standard sessions, we might try a full conference of poster sessions, where both the presenter and the audience could get the benefit of one on one exchange. With all the concern in both EDRA and Div. 34 about settings, do we really think the standard sessions with three papers and some audience comments, or workshops are best? -- Jack jnasar@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9206261430.AA01049@top.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!swrinde!news.dell.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!MAGNUS.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU!JNASARShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1112ac,6913fa22510bc02b,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1112ac,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-06-26 03:45:22 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!swrinde!news.dell.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!MAGNUS.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU!JNASAR
From: jnasar@MAGNUS.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU (Jack L Nasar)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.envbeh-l
Subject: edra bashing
Message-ID: <9206261430.AA01049@top.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
Date: 26 Jun 92 14:30:21 GMT
Sender: Forum on Environment and Human Behavior
<ENVBEH-L@POLYGRAF.BITNET>
Lines: 32
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]