Article View: bit.listserv.freemasonry
Article #162Re: Co-Masonry
From: John Herold
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 1994 03:37
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 1994 03:37
44 lines
3389 bytes
3389 bytes
Quoting Ron Boutwell <Fri Jul 15 1994 20:49> to John Herold: JH>To be honest, Ron, I find that attitude somewhat hysterical. If a JH>Mason can't defend it (for whatever reason), then I have to suspect JH>that he doesn't understand either historical or contemporary JH>Masonry. I want you to understand that I don't mean that as a JH>personal attack, but rather as an observation. Perhaps some older, JH>wiser, experienced heads among your Masonic aquaintances cna help JH>you with the subject. > Let's take an objective (outsiders) stance for a moment rather than a > mason's stance. No, let's not. Masonry is not defined by the uninitiated. > Perhaps an older Mason can give you a good enough > reason to justify the solely MASCULINE stance on Masonry. But you and > I are Masons. We would be much quicker to give such a justification > the benefit of the doubt because WE WANT TO HEAR A GOOD EXPLAINATION, > so even a NOT SO GOOD one sounds far better than it is. Hey, just a minute, there. Don't include me with your "we". When I joined I might have agreed with you, but not after learning more about it and going through the chairs. > You say that > if a Mason can't defend the masculine restriction on Masonry he dosn't > understand either historical or contemporary Masonry. I, too, hopw > you will not take this response as an attack because it TOO is not, > but I say BUNK! I've heard way too many older Masons as you say > trying to logically defend the position and if I take the stance of an > objective outsider, NONE of these explainations hold water. Simply Since the "outsider" view is immaterial and you seem to base your argument on the premise that it means something, I don't see where we can discuss agreeably. As a result of your writing I do maintain that you lack an understanding of Masonry (IMO, anyway) and simply have an axe to grind - whether out of sincer interest in the Craft or from some need you have, I cannot say. However, I'm sorry this medium doesn't lend itself to the replies I would need to make to you to help you learn. --- QM v1.31 * Origin: King Solomon's Mine Baltimore MD (410)494-1533 (1:261/1023.0)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<79.513.975@indy.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!indy.com!john.heroldShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 115ce7,9be4fee0f7236ded X-Google-Attributes: gid115ce7,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-07-17 20:37:00 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!indy.com!john.herold Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Newsgroups: bit.listserv.freemasonry Comments: ******************************************************** Comments: * The following "Approved" statement verifies header * Comments: * information for gateway passage. No approval of the * Comments: * content is implied. * Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU * Comments: ******************************************************** Resent-Message-Id: <m0qRYfZ-000E1yC@dorite.use.com> Reply-To: freemasonry@indy.com Resent-From: freemasonry@indy.com Sender: root@indy.com Subject: Re: Co-Masonry From: john.herold@indy.com (John Herold) Message-ID: <79.513.975@indy.com> Date: Sun, 17 Jul 94 22:37:00 -0500 Organization: The User Friendly BBS (317) 784-0520 Lines: 43