Article View: bit.listserv.freemasonry
Article #181Re: Co-Masonry
From: Ron Boutwell
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 1994 17:17
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 1994 17:17
54 lines
3685 bytes
3685 bytes
Earlier JOHN HEROLD said: JH> > Let's take an objective (outsiders) stance for a moment rather JH> > than a mason's stance. JH>No, let's not. Masonry is not defined by the uninitiated. No, you're right. It's not defined by the uninitiated. But our NEW MEMBERSHIP will surely come from the ranks of the uninitiated. And men today are far more concerned with questions of sexual and racial predudice than they once were only a few decades ago. Your (The Lodges) answers to these questions are going to have direct results on their decisions to join or stay away. Don't fool yourself into thinking it dosn't matter what the OUTSIDER thinks. That outsider today is our prospect for a new member tomorrow. If he is concerned with issues of discrimination and you give him the same bogus rationalizations we throw around here, you are going to lose a potential candidate. That's why I said "Let's take an objective OUTSIDERS view here. If you are unable to see this lodge with the objective eyes of an outsider, you are also unable to see what it is going to take to attract him to this fraternity. And besides, no good decision has ever been made by someone without cool-headed, non- emotional objectivity. If you are saying it dosn't matter what out FUTURE PETITIONERS think of this fraternity and you would rather stick to the same old, same old rather than take the necessary growth steps to keep new men coming into our lodges into the next century and that you would rather see it dwindle slowely into oblivion rather than make a simple change for growths sake, then we really can't agree. Think I'm predicting doomsday too early? Ask a Mason in his 90's how many men they initiated every year back in the 40s and 50s then compare it to the average lodge in the same geographical area today. Also, ask him how many Masons routinely attended lodge on a monthly basis. Likewise compare that to present numbers. The drop off has been nothing short of astounding. The most astounding part is that a fraternity as old as ours could experience such a drop in only a few decades. A simple trend analysis will show you where we are going and how few years we have before we reach that point if we simply STAY THE COURSE. Sincerely, Ron Boutwell, Moderator Prather Lodge #717 Indianapolis, IN (F&AM) Prather Chapter (RAM), Prather Council (CM Raper Commandry (KT), Indianapolis Valley (AASR) --- * CMPQwk 1.4 #648 * CONGRESS.SYS Corrupted: Re-boot Washington D.C (Y/n)?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<79.545.975@indy.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!indy.com!ron.boutwellShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 115ce7,9be4fee0f7236ded X-Google-Attributes: gid115ce7,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-07-21 10:17:00 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!indy.com!ron.boutwell Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Newsgroups: bit.listserv.freemasonry Comments: ******************************************************** Comments: * The following "Approved" statement verifies header * Comments: * information for gateway passage. No approval of the * Comments: * content is implied. * Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU * Comments: ******************************************************** Resent-Message-Id: <m0qRYg1-000E1oC@dorite.use.com> Reply-To: freemasonry@indy.com Resent-From: freemasonry@indy.com Sender: root@indy.com Subject: Re: Co-Masonry From: ron.boutwell@indy.com (Ron Boutwell) Message-ID: <79.545.975@indy.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 94 12:17:00 -0500 Organization: The User Friendly BBS (317) 784-0520 Lines: 53