Article View: bit.listserv.freemasonry
Article #478Re: Important
From: Ron Boutwell
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 1994 05:51
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 1994 05:51
57 lines
3483 bytes
3483 bytes
Earlier DONATTO@GATE.NET said this to ALL about Re: Important: D>Ron, I would suggest that an attempt at an unmoderated forum would be D>worth the time (extra for you, less wait for us) and effort. What D>could possibly go wrong??? D>Darrel Donatto D>donatto@gate.net Darrel, Well, I am willing to unmoderate the list and it WILL save me a lot of personal time if I do. However, you really do not want to know the answer to your last question about what possible could happen. The good users of this network are not aware of the incredible influx of anti-masonic or Mason-bashing posts that already come into the net daily. The fact is, there is far more of those posts than the legitimate ones you see here now. In moderating I filter them out. I do not filter out honest questions however. if someone says, "My minister says you all pray to Satan-is this true?" I leave it on the net for everyone to answer. This poster seems to want the truth, I likewise, want them to hear the truth. However, I filter out about a dozen posts a day from people who do not want answer to anything. They leave rediculous nonsense about Masons being part of the Illuminati and trying to take over the world. Yes, even accusations of satan worship. I simply delete these posts and I am the only one here who has to be bothered with the ignorance. Now, like I said, I can have it fixed so that there is no moderation, but we are opening up a fine communications tool to riff-raff who want to disrupt it and simply cause trouble. I had sort of hoped the net could be kept free of the nonsense so honest non-masons wanting honest answers from rational people could get them while Masons were able to discuss serious topics without either party mentioned having to waste their time with Mason-bashing nonsense. However, this is as much your net as mine. So far, I have recieved a couple of votes to go unmoderated and no votes to remain moderated. I will give it about 3 weeks in order to be fair to the users in remote areas who may receive the net later than others. They should be afforded the opportunity to speak their votes as well. Ron Boutwell Indianapolis, Indiana --- * CmpQwk 1.30 #648 * V���!� W� d�'t gt � t�k�g v��!!!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<79.1104.975.0C9381DD@indy.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!gatech!paladin.american.edu!auvm!indy.com!ron.boutwellShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 115ce7,f266dd02693afee9 X-Google-Attributes: gid115ce7,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-06-22 04:18:33 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!gatech!paladin.american.edu!auvm!indy.com!ron.boutwell Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Newsgroups: bit.listserv.freemasonry Comments: ******************************************************** Comments: * The following "Approved" statement verifies header * Comments: * information for gateway passage. No approval of the * Comments: * content is implied. * Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU * Comments: ******************************************************** Reply-To: freemasonry@indy.com Sender: freemasonry@indy.com Subject: Re: Important From: ron.boutwell@indy.com (Ron Boutwell) Message-ID: <79.1104.975.0C9381DD@indy.com> In-Reply-To: <199406202150.RAA40159@inca.gate.net> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 94 00:51:00 -0500 Organization: The User Friendly BBS (317) 784-0520 Lines: 56