Article View: bit.listserv.geograph
Article #6913Re: What is feminist "geography"?
From: Christopher Brian Pound
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1993 20:06
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1993 20:06
34 lines
2951 bytes
2951 bytes
In article <2dlr5k$lkl@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> rjackson@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Randy W Jackson) writes: >Of course, and I doubt that you would find anyone who would vehemently defend >the concept of absolute objectivity. In no way, however, does this fact render >empirical research a fantasy. Right, but the problem with empiricism isn't really its objectivist tendencies (although that's generally what you'll hear about it from someone still thinking in terms of subject/object). Empiricist approaches partake in a false consciousness of the analytic that excludes any examination of the social conditions in which knowledge is produced. By "social conditions," I'm talking about a whole lot of things besides just personal bias or the limits of perspective. Frex, I'm talking about the thoroughly historicizable assumption that data exist apart from the theory that explains them and that the analyst can take some position outside of or blind to the work she or he undertakes (obviously, the analyst can set the experiment up such that she or he won't be able to influence the outcome, but in the process of setting up the experiment, the kind of outcomes that will be possible are necessarily "controlled"). I'm also talking about the empiricist's amnesia with regard to his or her socialization as an analyst and with regard to the metaphoricity on which her or his explanations of the results of the experiment will necessarily hinge. And, also, about the blind acceptance of traditional categories like "theory/practice," "fact/fiction," "subject/object," "order/chaos," "knowing/being," "identity/difference," "apparent/real," "revealed/hidden," "said/seen," "self/other," and so many other problematic oppositions that constitute our intellectual heritage. So you see, it's not a matter of personal bias, but of the unreflexivity with respect to power (authority, social status, etc.), representation (truth, metaphor, simulation, etc.) and the intersections between the two. That's what's really troublesome about empiricism. -- Christopher Pound + "Homer deserves to be thrown out of the Anthro Grad Student + contests and flogged." pound@rice.edu + -- Heraclitus
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<CHH6Iu.2Cv@rice.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!noc.near.net!das-news.harvard.edu!husc-news.harvard.edu!hsdndev!newsfeed.rice.edu!rice!poundReferences:
<931201143146.22217a5b@TECHNET.NM.ORG> <2dlr5k$lkl@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10870e,a867f8e100f965f9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10870e,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-12-04 04:10:06 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!noc.near.net!das-news.harvard.edu!husc-news.harvard.edu!hsdndev!newsfeed.rice.edu!rice!pound Newsgroups: bit.listserv.geograph Subject: Re: What is feminist "geography"? Message-ID: <CHH6Iu.2Cv@rice.edu> From: pound@ruf.rice.edu (Christopher Brian Pound) Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1993 20:06:28 GMT Sender: news@rice.edu (News) References: <931201143146.22217a5b@TECHNET.NM.ORG> <2dlr5k$lkl@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> Organization: Rice University Lines: 34