RLG standards

Article View: bit.listserv.imagelib

Article #203

Back to bit.listserv.imagelib Previous Next

#203

From: Mark Allan
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 00:00

14 lines
1244 bytes

I recently talked to a person who is not a subscriber to this list, but has some
 background in imaging technologies.  He stated that most of the equipment out
 there does not meet RLG standards with regard to digitizing  microfilm,
 particularly due to film skew.  Is this currently the case, and if there is
 equipment conforming to said standards, is anybody willing to float me their
 favorite products?  Also, on the low end of the price range, does Screen Scan
 conform to these standards?


Mark A. Allan
Reference/Social Science/Outreach Librarian
New Mexico State University
mallan@lib.nmsu.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <01BD3235.5086A9E0@bran-pub-12.NMSU.Edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fede4,e6ba2f11578097e7,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfede4,public
From: Mark Allan <mallan@LIB.NMSU.EDU>
Subject: RLG standards
Date: 1998/02/05
Message-ID: <01BD3235.5086A9E0@bran-pub-12.NMSU.Edu>
X-Deja-AN: 322587640
Sender: IMAGELIB <IMAGELIB@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Comments: ********************************************************
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by listserv.arizona.edu id MAA21414
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.imagelib