Article View: bit.listserv.imagelib
Article #205Re: RLG standards
From: Emil Levine
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 1998 00:00
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 1998 00:00
37 lines
1732 bytes
1732 bytes
What are the RLG standards? I don't know if this is a factor of cost. We have a $25,000 Fujitsu 3099 and still get skew which we clean up painlessly during routine enhancement. Suggest you look at Anne Kenney's book on QC. Emil Levine Head, INIS Clearinghouse UN/IAEA/INIS PO Box 100 Vienna Austria A1400 43-1-2060-22880/29882 fax e.levine@iaea.org >---------- >From: Mark Allan[SMTP:mallan@LIB.NMSU.EDU] >Sent: Thursday, 05 February 1998 20:55 >To: IMAGELIB@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU >Subject: RLG standards > >I recently talked to a person who is not a subscriber to this list, but has >some background in imaging technologies. He stated that most of the >equipment out there does not meet RLG standards with regard to digitizing >microfilm, particularly due to film skew. Is this currently the case, and if >there is equipment conforming to said standards, is anybody willing to float >me their favorite products? Also, on the low end of the price range, does >Screen Scan conform to these standards? > > >Mark A. Allan >Reference/Social Science/Outreach Librarian >New Mexico State University >mallan@lib.nmsu.edu >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<c=AT%a=_%p=IAEA%l=IAEA_M1-980206080905Z-142768@iaea_m1.iaea.or.at>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fede4,e6ba2f11578097e7 X-Google-Attributes: gidfede4,public From: Emil Levine <E.Levine@IAEA.ORG> Subject: Re: RLG standards Date: 1998/02/06 Message-ID: <c=AT%a=_%p=IAEA%l=IAEA_M1-980206080905Z-142768@iaea_m1.iaea.or.at> X-Deja-AN: 322713366 Sender: IMAGELIB <IMAGELIB@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Comments: ******************************************************** Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: bit.listserv.imagelib