🚀 go-pugleaf

At 11:36 AM 4/16/98 -0400, Charling Chang Fagan wrote:
>At 09:10 AM 4/16/98 -0400, you wrote:
>>At 04:25 PM 4/15/98 -0600, you wrote:
>>>At 03:21 PM 4/15/98 -0500, you wrote:
>>>>I just came accross some proof sheets from about 1925 or 1926 of the Paul
>>>>Whiteman Orchestra.  Many of these have not been published ever, but are
>>>>in pathetic condition.  In some cases the images are not even discernable,
>>>>but for those that are, a heavy brown-red cast has discolored them and
>>>>obscured contrasts.  Some are worth keeping, maybe even publishing in the
>>>>right arenas.
>>>>
>>>David---
>>>>Sounds like you have proofs on print-out-paper.  This stuff is extremely
>>>sensitive to light, especially daylight and flourescent.   Negs could be
>>>proofed without chemicals . . . just a strong light source, and were not
>>>permanent.    The reason photogs used P.O.P.  was to keep people from
>>>framing the proofs.. The shots would turn dark red and the image would go
>>>away when exposed to light.
>>>
>>>I don't think photographing them will be successful.  My best guess
would be
>>>to scan them on a flatbed, and get them off the bed as soon as the scan
>>>completes, then use photoshop to bring the contrast to at least a usable
>>>level.   In the meantime, protect them from light and heat.
>>>
>>>Sonny Carter
>>>Digital Imaging Specialist
>>>Cammie G. Henry Research Center
>>>Northwestern State University of Louisiana
>>>
>>>You can't always get what you want,
>>> but sometimes, if you try, you can get what you need!
>>>
>>>
>>I will be away from April 6th to april 15th.  I will respond to all mail
>>when I return.
>>
>>
>I will be away from April 6th to april 15th.  I will respond to all mail
>when I return.
>
>
I will be away from April 6th to april 15th.  I will respond to all mail
when I return.