Article View: bit.listserv.japan
Article #1237recent changes
From: freduleman
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 1994 14:11
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 1994 14:11
46 lines
3730 bytes
3730 bytes
----------------------------Original message---------------------------- Given the difficulty in coordinating their candidate lists (plus their very understandable reluctance to put their perks at risk), why would the LDP-JSP-Sakigake coalition want to call an election anytime soon? And remember that they have a majority in the lower house. So why would there be an election? There seem to be two answers here: (i) that the people want it and (ii) that the LDP and JSP coalition will not hold (such that they will lose their majority). The people want it? So what? Did the people want Hata as PM? Did the people want Kaifu? Come to think of it, did the people who voted for the JSP in the last election want it to say the SDF is Constitutional? No. The system is set up so that the people elect representatives and then hope for the best. Unless there is marching in the streets, I do not see what the people supposedly want as having much impact. (And I cannot picture people marching in the streets to install an Ozawa govt.) The LDP-JSP coalition will not hold? Why not? We have seen the JSP adopt the LDP platform. We have seen the JSP's Kubo on TV (channel 10) last night get asked about the discrepancy between what the JSP was saying last year and what it is saying now and calmly reply (in my rough translation) "As an opposition party, we had to oppose and oppose very stridently. But as a govt party, we have to work from the reality, and that means accepting things as they are as a starting point." In addition, we have the JSP meeting yesterday where most of the people in attendance basically accepted this radically new JSP policy line. Sure there is grumbling from people who thought the JSP meant what it was saying about the SDF being unconstitutional, about opposing nuclear power plants, about not liking the prewar flag and anthem, and about a lot of other things, but I do not see these grumblers (JSP-hard-liners?) as the dominant force in the party. At best, they are maybe 23-30%, and even if they split off to form a new party, they would probably grudgingly support the current coalition from outside the cabinet (kaku-gai kyouryoku). Somebody mentioned that the farmers are angry at losing their protection. But who was in power when that happened? And then who got the rice farmers a special subsidy recently. So who are the farmers going to vote for? That said, I suspect that when the election finally does come, the JSP will be a major loser because it will not have any independent identity or any credibility. -- Fred Uleman
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<00982580.A96DB2C0.66@tanuki.twics.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!nntp.msstate.edu!paladin.american.edu!auvm!twics.com!fredulemanShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 113873,142fb6fea855a006 X-Google-Attributes: gid113873,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-08-02 10:21:42 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!nntp.msstate.edu!paladin.american.edu!auvm!twics.com!freduleman Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Newsgroups: bit.listserv.japan Comments: ******************************************************** Comments: * The following "Approved" statement verifies header * Comments: * information for gateway passage. No approval of the * Comments: * content is implied. * Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU * Comments: ******************************************************** Approved-By: "James W. Reese" <R505040@UNIVSCVM.BITNET> Message-ID: <00982580.A96DB2C0.66@tanuki.twics.com> Date: Tue, 2 Aug 1994 10:11:33 EDT Reply-To: freduleman@twics.com Sender: Japanese Business and Economics Network <JAPAN@PUCC.BITNET> From: freduleman@twics.com Subject: recent changes Lines: 45