Article View: bit.listserv.l-vmctr
Article #103Re: Rules Facility
From: Richard W Wiggins
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1992 15:16
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1992 15:16
21 lines
1602 bytes
1602 bytes
>Hmmm... we have user rules set up to only allow a select set of LUs >access to certain SCI user ids. However the Rules Facility seems to >ignore the restrictions when a user dials in on a 'virtual' LU such as >the ones created by IBM's VM TCP/IP product (Lnnn). Has anyone else >noticed this? Let me betray my VTAM ignorance here, but it seems the pool of Lnnn users is not something you have control over. Is it not the case that CP deals from one deck of Lnnn numbers, no matter how the session is created? (Ie FAL, SESSION, what have you?) It would be nice if there could be separate pools, and if FAL could assign people to separate groups based on, for instance, a table of originating IP addresses. For instance, we'd love to be able to logically segment staff terminals for our librarians from dialup phone users, such that our VSE guest knows which pool is which set of users. Could you give a specific example of what you're doing with rules, and how it works at all for any LDEV users? /Rich Wiggins, Michigan State U
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<L-VMCTR%92100811223982@VM1.CC.UAKRON.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uvaarpa!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!MSU.BITNET!RWWMAINTShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uvaarpa!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!MSU.BITNET!RWWMAINT
Message-ID: <L-VMCTR%92100811223982@VM1.CC.UAKRON.EDU>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.l-vmctr
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 11:16:56 EDT
Sender: VMCENTER Components Discussion List <L-VMCTR@AKRONVM.BITNET>
From: Richard W Wiggins <RWWMAINT@MSU.BITNET>
Subject: Re: Rules Facility
In-Reply-To: Message of Wed,
7 Oct 1992 14:20:40 PDT from <SROKA@SJSUVM1.SJSU.EDU>
Lines: 21