Article View: bit.listserv.l-vmctr
Article #110Running A Merge/Purge
From: Ron Wigmore
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 13:15
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 13:15
18 lines
1291 bytes
1291 bytes
Our last Merge/Purge was done about three years ago. We will be running one this weekend, and I am not sure how to handle bad tapes. Hopefully someone out there has just run a Merge/Purge and so can readily tell me how to correctly process bad tapes. Some tapes are 'bad' because of incorrect dataset counts, etc., but most simply get I/O errors when VMBACKUP trys to read the tape. I know what some of the volsers are, but there are probably many others among the 700 tapes that will be Merge/Purged. Does anyone have any tips on how to minimize the length of time it will take to do the Merge/Purge? Given that when VMAMPU hits a bad tape, the run will abend, will using the "FORCE" option enable the rest of the tape(s) to be processed or are all of the files after that tape be lost? All suggestions welcome! Ron,,,
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<921215.081533.EST.SYST8103@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!auvm!RYEVM.RYERSON.CA!SYST8103Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!auvm!RYEVM.RYERSON.CA!SYST8103 Message-ID: <921215.081533.EST.SYST8103@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.l-vmctr Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 08:15:33 EST Sender: VMCENTER Components Discussion List <L-VMCTR@AKRONVM.BITNET> From: Ron Wigmore <SYST8103@RYEVM.RYERSON.CA> Subject: Running A Merge/Purge Lines: 18