Re: VMBACKUP/E 1.0 and the SFS

Article View: bit.listserv.l-vmctr

Article #658

Back to bit.listserv.l-vmctr Previous Next

#658

From: chris
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1993 16:01

6 lines
1125 bytes

On Fri, 5 Feb 1993 07:18:13 EST Katherine Faella said:
>I guess I didn't make myself totally clear.  The problem with VMBACKUP
>and the SFS comes when you do not have VMBACKUP make/keep a catalog
That will always be a problem.   I found that not keeping VMBACKUP
catalog from backup runs is a no no.   Just like a puzzle all the parts
must be there or the puzzle will not be complete.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <L-VMCTR%93020511100986@VM1.CC.UAKRON.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!RICEVM1.RICE.EDU!CHRIS

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fe320,6736e0483a494cca
X-Google-Attributes: gidfe320,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-02-05 08:01:14 PST
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!RICEVM1.RICE.EDU!CHRIS
Return-Path: <@VM1.CC.UAKRON.EDU:CHRIS@ricevm1.rice.edu>
Message-ID: <L-VMCTR%93020511100986@VM1.CC.UAKRON.EDU>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.l-vmctr
Date:         Fri, 5 Feb 1993 10:01:14 CST
Sender:       VMCENTER Components Discussion List <L-VMCTR@AKRONVM.BITNET>
From:         chris <CHRIS@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>
Subject:      Re: VMBACKUP/E 1.0 and the SFS
In-Reply-To:  Message of Fri, 5 Feb 1993 07:18:13 EST from <KMF@URIACC.URI.EDU>
Lines: 6