Article View: bit.listserv.l-vmctr
Article #742Re: VMTAPE Mount: WAIT option
From: Richard W Wiggins
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1992 15:48
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1992 15:48
20 lines
1520 bytes
1520 bytes
> Sure, it would be useful. The site could set a global default >waiting period in the VMTAPE CONFIG file as above, and then if the >user didn't want to wait that long (or didn't mind waiting even >longer) then s/he could override it with the command option. Sounds >neat to me! > > - Lee I like the idea of the option, and it'd probably be a low-cost, good payoff thing to do (ie worth doing). But I think the default should be infinite; I can't imagine how to pick a number that is appropriate, and why not just let the user choose if so inclined? If such an enhancement is suggested be sure to specify that for disconnected users (esp. batch jobs) Wait should default to infinite. I can envision a batch job waiting on a tape mount across a holiday if the drives don't get drained. /Rich Wiggins, Michigan State U
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<L-VMCTR%92062411585947@VM1.CC.UAKRON.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!MSU.BITNET!RWWMAINTShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fe320,1fdc515fe464db9f X-Google-Attributes: gidfe320,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-06-24 01:36:04 PST Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!MSU.BITNET!RWWMAINT Message-ID: <L-VMCTR%92062411585947@VM1.CC.UAKRON.EDU> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.l-vmctr Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1992 11:48:32 EDT Sender: VMCENTER Components Discussion List <L-VMCTR@AKRONVM.BITNET> From: Richard W Wiggins <RWWMAINT@MSU.BITNET> Subject: Re: VMTAPE Mount: WAIT option In-Reply-To: Message of Wed, 24 Jun 1992 01:30:00 EDT from <GARNER@FSUAVM> Lines: 20