Article View: bit.listserv.labmgr
Article #231Re: Netscape in a lab
From: Michael Han
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 00:00
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 00:00
39 lines
2837 bytes
2837 bytes
----------------------------Original message---------------------------- Previously... > We are about to install Netscape ver 3.0 on PC's running Windows >3.11. Has anyone figured out a solution to the problem of students >entering in bogus email addresses under Options/Mail and News >Preferences/Identity? Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. This was just discussed, but here goes again. Netscape, as a POP3 client, makes obvious an existing and known "fault" in the SMTP protocol. SMTP does *not* care if the sender of a message is who s/he claims to be. Regardless, it is a bit annoying to receive email from god@heaven.com or bill@microsoft.com or bill@whitehouse.gov. With the Windows version of Netscape, it is rather difficult to block access to Netscape's mail facility. And if you want to offer Netscape as a POP3 client, you have even more problems. My advice is this; try to enforce accountability. If your lab has any means of tracking a user to a workstation at a given time (sign in sheets, authentication software, etc.), the received message headers should reveal who sent the message (Received from: station8.lab.university.edu -08:00 8/20/96) and allow you to figure out who was responsible for the forged message. It's not much, but it's a start. You can also investigate Netscape's expensive ($2000) Administrator's kit, which allows you to place a Netscape.lck file, which locks up preferences a bit more successfully than simple .ini settings, or so they say. Still, I'm not sure how successful this will be. And again, this begs the question of whether you want authenticated users to be able to use Netscape mail or not. And, of course, this assumes that your users won't be clever enough to blow away the file in the File Manager and then go about their business happily. It all boils down to the very simple point, SMTP is not in the least bit secure and offers very little in terms of authentication. To my knowledge, little is being done to address this. The real solution to this problem is education of senders and recipients. _________ mike (han@library.ucsf.edu) "I had lately learned that another way of writing FALL IN LOVE is WALK THE PLANK." - Jeanette Winterson
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<19960827.135703.761819.NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fc881,34cc88618b4a132c X-Google-Attributes: gidfc881,public From: Michael Han <Michael.Han@library.ucsf.edu> Subject: Re: Netscape in a lab Date: 1996/08/27 Message-ID: <19960827.135703.761819.NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU> X-Deja-AN: 177116925 sender: Computer Lab Managers <LABMGR@LSV.UKY.EDU> comments: ******************************************************** approved-by: List Moderator <LSTOWN@UKCC.UKY.EDU> newsgroups: bit.listserv.labmgr resent-subject: Re: Netscape in a lab x-mailer: MailBook 95.01.000