🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: bit.listserv.labmgr
Article #348

Re: Comparison of Printing Costs

#348
From: David Craig
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 00:00
48 lines
2564 bytes
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Mary E. Parlett wrote:
>
> ----------------------------Original message----------------------------
> Once again I am in the position of having to look at printing
> options in our IBM Labs.  Up until now we have been using
> dot matrix printers (first HP Ruggedwriters, then Epson and
> NEC 24 pin printers).  The Ruggedwriters were slow but absolute
> workhorses; the Epsons and NEC simply don't seem to be able to
> take the constant use and abuse.
>

Agreed.

> I'd like to switch either to DeskJets or LaserJets but my
> management is very concerned about the cost of consumables.
> Has anyone got any information about this that they can share
> with me?
>
> Also, if you are using either DeskJets or LaserJets, do you
> have limited usage (i.e. only when consultants are around,
> per page cost) or is it wide-open usage?
>

Yes, we limit printing via a value card sale system. (Copytex). The value cards
working extremely well in the photocopiers, but cause some problems for laser pr
output.

The difficulty comes in management of print queues, when people spool jobs and d
collect them. This means that any subsequent users must either clear jobs ahead
theirs, pay to print them, or seek admin help (me).

Once the users come to terms with deleting queued jobs, the system works reasona
well.

However, if you come up with a better solution in you deliberations, I would be
interested to hear...

> Thanks for any info you can provide me.


--
David Craig                        email dcraig@eee.utas.edu.au
System Administrator,              phone          +61 02 202127
Electrical & Electronic Engineering,     University of Tasmania

In this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics! Homer Simpson
Technical Details
Message-ID: <31C5E052.33CB@eee.utas.edu.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <9606151613.AA00480@dave.ocs.union.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fc881,e93216f2d81c5117
X-Google-Attributes: gidfc881,public
From: David Craig <dcraig@eee.utas.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Comparison of Printing Costs
Date: 1996/06/18
Message-ID: <31C5E052.33CB@eee.utas.edu.au>
X-Deja-AN: 160885349
sender: Computer Lab Managers <LABMGR@LSV.UKY.EDU>
references: <9606151613.AA00480@dave.ocs.union.edu>
comments: ********************************************************
approved-by: List Moderator <LSTOWN@UKCC.UKY.EDU>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
resent-subject: Re: Comparison of Printing Costs
organization: University of Tasmania
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: bit.listserv.labmgr
x-mailer: MailBook 95.01.000