Article View: bit.listserv.labmgr
Article #761Re: folderbolt pro
From: Kate Coffield
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 1995 00:00
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 1995 00:00
18 lines
1444 bytes
1444 bytes
----------------------------Original message---------------------------- Randall Blondeau wrote: > We have been using Foolproof for almost 1 year and with only a few >exceptions, have had no problems with access. The problems are that some >installers will bypass the security and install where we don't want them >to. The strange part is that they usually won't completely install whatever >it is they were supposed to. Yeah, installers are fussy. I usually turn off FoolProof via keystroke when I launch them. Some programs you're installing won't work unless you let the installer put stuff where it wants to, esp. system extensions and control panels. If you've configured FoolProof to lock users out of those (generally advisable!), it will also do the same to you when you try to install. It's a feature, not a bug, as they say.... Kate kate@auc-acs.eun.eg
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<951223174723.1f2f8@auc-acs.eun.eg>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fc881,24b8d4ed191c98b4 X-Google-Attributes: gidfc881,public From: Kate Coffield <KATE@auc-acs.eun.eg> Subject: Re: folderbolt pro Date: 1995/12/25 Message-ID: <951223174723.1f2f8@auc-acs.eun.eg> X-Deja-AN: 122861753 sender: Computer Lab Managers <LABMGR@UKCC.UKY.EDU> comments: ******************************************************** approved-by: List Moderator <LSTOWN@UKCC.UKY.EDU> newsgroups: bit.listserv.labmgr resent-subject: Re: folderbolt pro x-mailer: MailBook 95.01.000