Softwindows Question

Article View: bit.listserv.labmgr

Article #766

Back to bit.listserv.labmgr Previous Next

#766

From: spore
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 1995 00:00

21 lines
1499 bytes

----------------------------Original message----------------------------

I'd appreciate hearing from anyone out there who has been
successfully in setting up Softwindows 2.0 for a *DOS* TCP/IP
stack. We've had no problems using WINSOCK, but unfortunately
have an ILL/Doc Delivery application ("QuickDOC") that
insists on non-Winsock telneting.

TIA,


========================================================
Stuart Spore              | voice: 212-263-1092
Head Library Medical      | fax:   212-263-6534
Informatics Group         |
NYU Medical Library       | spores01@library.med.nyu.edu
550 1st Ave.              | http://pages.nyu.edu/~spore
New York, N.Y. 10016      |
========================================================
*   Non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatum
========================================================

Technical Details

Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.91.951227151946.25598A-100000@is2.NYU.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fc881,f4280c848ddbef6b,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfc881,public
From: spore <spore@is2.NYU.EDU>
Subject: Softwindows Question
Date: 1995/12/28
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.91.951227151946.25598A-100000@is2.NYU.EDU>
X-Deja-AN: 123017300
sender: Computer Lab Managers <LABMGR@UKCC.UKY.EDU>
comments: ********************************************************
approved-by: List Moderator <LSTOWN@UKCC.UKY.EDU>
content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
resent-subject: Softwindows Question
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: bit.listserv.labmgr
x-mailer: MailBook 95.01.000