🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 26 Dec 1991 11:09:30 CST Richard A. Schafer said:
>
>........ some deleted .......
>
>....................................  However, his sample message is
>in some since even worse: it's neither RFC822 *nor* NOTE format, and
>frankly clearly shows that PROFS Ext. Mail really is a lousy
>hack, if it generates such seriously munged headers like the one shown.

Richard,
  I would not hesitate to agree that EM is less than average in the
way/s it does things (after looking at the code I wonder that it runs at
all sometimes, other times I like what I see).
  However, more than just my site is 'stuck' with it, and so we would
like to be able to exist with others (like RM users, for instance).
  Looking at a EM note and a CMS note it looks like EM is sort of a
cross between 822 and NOTE, with some decidedly EM only stuff thrown in.
I would be happy to lend some examples of how EM makes notes so that the
next release, or next release + ?, will be able to cope with EM notes
just like other notes.  But hurry, downsizing is suppose to hit here in
just about 10 months.

Scott Mattes

Remember, Jesus is the reason for the season, not sales!

-------------------- To help me keep it all in perspective  -------------------
No success can compensate for failure in the home.
--David O. McKay, Pres. 1951-70, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints