Article View: bit.listserv.nettrain
Article #10961Apology
From: Jim Milles
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1993 21:18
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1993 21:18
46 lines
3117 bytes
3117 bytes
Folks, I would like to apologize, both to the subscribers of this list and to Michael Hart personally, for the tone of my earlier posting about the Gutenberg Newsletter. Whatever merit my position may have had, it was not appropriate of me to vent my feelings of exasperation on this discussion list. As one subscriber has pointed out, if a NETTRAIN subscriber had posted a message like this, I would have returned it and asked the sender to rephrase it more temperately, if not to reconsider the posting altogether. My only excuse is that I wanted to respond quickly so as to forestall a flood of private e-mail. I should probably explain more clearly why I asked for a public discussion. I have received comments--privately--from NETTRAIN subscribers who felt that Gutenberg postings did not belong on NETTRAIN because they bore little, if any, connection to the topic of the list. Michael Hart, on the other hand, indicates that the comments--again, private comments--he hears from NETTRAIN subscribers are overwhelmingly favorable. In my role as listowner/moderator, I am guided by your wishes as to what you want to get out of this list. Some listowners use a heavy hand in squelching "inappropriate" discussions, and subscribers are apparently free either to adhere to the listowner's guidelines, or to unsubsribe. On this list, however, in keeping with the cooperative spirit of the Internet, I wish the scope of discussion to be determined with the participation of the subscribers. That is why I asked for a public discussion to clarify this issue: specifically, whether the majority of subscribers find Project Gutenberg Newsletter postings and updates sufficiently valuable for Internet training purposes that these postings should be made available on this list. If it were totally up to me, I would have no problem with Michael Hart's Gutenberg postings appearing on NETTRAIN--but as I view my role as moderator, it is not totally up to me. My decision to "take the discussion public" was intended in this spirit; I want to be guided by what the NETTRAIN subscribers want. Once again, my apologies. Jim Milles (listowner/moderator, NETTRAIN) Fax: (314) 658-3966 Head of Computer Services Phone: (314) 658-2759 Saint Louis University Law Library millesjg@sluvca.slu.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<CC9A614CA0815319@SLUVCA.SLU.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uvaarpa!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!SLUVCA.SLU.EDU!MILLESJGShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10449f,93c95ac019989e9,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10449f,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-02-01 13:18:00 PST Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uvaarpa!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!SLUVCA.SLU.EDU!MILLESJG Return-Path: <@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU,@UBVM.cc.buffalo.edu:MILLESJG@SLUVCA.SLU.EDU> X-Envelope-to: nettrain@ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu X-VMS-To: @NETTRAIN Message-ID: <CC9A614CA0815319@SLUVCA.SLU.EDU> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nettrain Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1993 15:18:00 CST Sender: Internet/BITNET Network Trainers <NETTRAIN@UBVM.BITNET> From: Jim Milles <MILLESJG@SLUVCA.SLU.EDU> Subject: Apology Lines: 46