🚀 go-pugleaf

----------- Original message below forwarded by NETTRAIN moderator ------------

Date: Thu, 11 Feb 93 05:50:26 PST
From: sharp@bmf.usc.edu (Malcolm Sharp)

In article <C8662D6FA081ED20@SLUVCA.SLU.EDU> you write:
>----------- Original message below forwarded by NETTRAIN moderator ------------
>
>Date: Fri, 05 Feb 93 09:21:06 CST
>From: HILL%CMSUVMA.BITNET@UBVM.cc.buffalo.edu
>
>It is obvious that most members of this list are NOT involved with the
>K-12 networking movement and only look at training in the higher education
>level.

not so - what's the question? concern?
Malcolm


----------- Original message below forwarded by NETTRAIN moderator ------------

Date: 11 Feb 1993 05:56:52 -0800
From: sharp@mizar.usc.edu (Malcolm Sharp)

Not sure what motivated this - but to quote the bard, "NOT."  ;)
We at USC are taking K-12 access to the Internet seriously.

Malcolm

In article <B111922520825055@SLUVCA.SLU.EDU> NETTRAIN <MILLESJG@SLUVCA.SLU.EDU>
writes:
>I too "beg to differ" (with the original post below).
>Although we don't fully support K-12 efforts on a regular basis here at
>Brown, as the state's K-12 schools get network connections to the internet,
>we have done demonstrations and will problably continue to train & support
>their efforts in the future.  I agree that K-12 is probably not the primary
>focus, but should not totally be neglected on this list either.
>
>>Date: Fri, 05 Feb 93 09:21:06 CST
>>From: HILL%CMSUVMA.BITNET@UBVM.cc.buffalo.edu
>>
>>It is obvious that most members of this list are NOT involved with the
>>K-12 networking movement and only look at training in the higher education
>>level.