Article View: bit.listserv.nettrain
Article #195Re: web use/response time
From: Gill, Kathy
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 00:00
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 00:00
70 lines
2812 bytes
2812 bytes
Hi, JQ: > From: JQ Johnson[SMTP:jqj@DARKWING.UOREGON.EDU] > > Kathy Gill quotes Nielsen: > > > The 15-second guideline in the previous paragraph was derived from the > > basic set of response time values that have been known since around > 1968. > > System response needs to happen within about 10 seconds to keep the > user's > > attention > > I did some human factors work in the mid 70s and looked closely at that > research at the time (it was still fairly new then!). The results were > all > over the map even then. > I hope I didn't imply that the paper was definitive -- it was the only one I found doing a quick search. I think the more important issue is of Feedback and predictability (your point). The feedback mechanism is now built into Windows/Mac interface with the "clock" that ticks away while you wait for something to happen. We don't have that on the web (yet). > What would you think of a guideline that required that web pages load in > 3s? Not very practical given current techology. > I agree that's not practical -- didn't I adhere to my "hold your breath" test in my note. <smile> > What the acceptable response time is for web sites remains an open and > interesting question. > > I asked Keith Instone, who maintains the Usable Web site (http://www.usableweb.com/) if he knew of any studies off the top of his head that looked at this issue. He said 'no' (he's also list mom for the ACM CHI-Web list). He does have a "speed" section, http://usableweb.com/items/speed.html . Primarily reports opinions/articles not research, though, except for this one from CHI 97: Internet Delay Effects: How Users Perceive Quality, Organization, and Ease of Use of Information http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi97/proceedings/short-talk/als2.htm It shows a definite correlation between "negative perception" and long wait times [mean: 6750 msec] for pages to load compared to short wait times [mean: 575 msec]. Note, this was 1997. And AnchorDesk (also 1997) Avoid Number 1 Web Site Sin: Slow Loading Pages http://www.zdnet.com/anchordesk/story/story_1244.html Kathy
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4D4CB3041445D211B9DC0008C7FAC6760172E83F@HQ-MSG05>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10449f,f8eaa3d2ff4be0e8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10449f,public From: "Gill, Kathy" <kathy.gill@ATTWS.COM> Subject: Re: web use/response time Date: 1999/05/05 Message-ID: <4D4CB3041445D211B9DC0008C7FAC6760172E83F@HQ-MSG05> X-Deja-AN: 475007421 Sender: Internet/BITNET Network Trainers <NETTRAIN@LISTSERV.ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU> Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU * Comments: To: JQ Johnson <jqj@DARKWING.UOREGON.EDU> Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: "Gill, Kathy" <kathy.gill@ATTWS.COM> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nettrain