Article View: bit.listserv.notabene
Article #19797Re: Windows 3.1 and MX=10
From: Mohan Matthen
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1992 15:45
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1992 15:45
13 lines
1412 bytes
1412 bytes
From: Mohan Matthen
Department of Philosophy
University of Alberta
Both Paul Bodin (in a private message) and Neil Brooks suggest that the memory
parity error I had been facing might be unrelated to MX=10, and might in fact
be a hardware problem, real or spurious (Neil says W3.1 is said to detect
errors other systems do not detect, some of these not errors at all). Well
I've disabled MX=10, and I'll report back if the problem recurs. I do use the
NOEMS setting with EMM, so whatever the problem is it isn't the same as the
one Peter Just was alluding to.
Best,
Mohan
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<NOTABENE%92061718461563@TAUNIVM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UALTAVM!MMATTHENShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 135dea,8d046c22dd16a693 X-Google-Attributes: gid135dea,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-06-17 04:24:54 PST Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UALTAVM!MMATTHEN Message-ID: <NOTABENE%92061718461563@TAUNIVM> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 92 09:45:00 MDT Sender: Nota Bene List <NOTABENE@TAUNIVM> Comments: Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2 From: Mohan Matthen <MMATTHEN@UALTAVM> Subject: Re: Windows 3.1 and MX=10 Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notabene In-Reply-To: note of 92-06-17 07:46 Lines: 13