Article View: bit.listserv.notabene
Article #19862Memory Parity Errors
From: Ada_W.Finifter
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 1992 17:17
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 1992 17:17
18 lines
1850 bytes
1850 bytes
I am only a very minor hardware guru but to my knowledge a memory parity error involves a faulty memory chip. The error msg may give you a code number which, in consultation with a technical reference manual, will identify the precise chip at fault. I have been able to troubleshoot this problem three times over the past 6 or 7 years, and each time with the help of the code number I was able to pinpoint the chip in terms of bank & location, and replace the chip myself, after which the parity error no longer appeared. However, all these instances were on 8088 machines. I assume the procedure would be similar on a 386. Interestingly, the first time it happened was when I set up NB with a RAM drive many years ago. There had never been any indication of a problem before because previously I had probably not been accessing that particular location. I've heard it said that standard diagnostics don't always find such bad chips. If the testing they do is very brief, and the failure is heat related, the chip may not warm up sufficiently during the test to fail. In my experience even repeated tests don't always show the error but when the parity error msg appears it should give you the code I referred to above.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<NOTABENE%92061920203464@TAUNIVM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!MSU!FINIFTERShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 135dea,9a3e7a920c664a03 X-Google-Attributes: gid135dea,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-06-19 12:17:04 PST Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!MSU!FINIFTER Message-ID: <NOTABENE%92061920203464@TAUNIVM> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 92 13:17:00 EDT Sender: Nota Bene List <NOTABENE@TAUNIVM> From: "Ada_W.Finifter" <FINIFTER@MSU> Subject: Memory Parity Errors Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notabene In-Reply-To: The letter of Thursday, 18 June 1992 2:38pm ET Lines: 18