🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: bit.listserv.omrscan
Article #18

Re: NCS vs SCANTRON

#18
From: Dan Precht
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 1992 15:49
27 lines
2138 bytes
>We are in the process of evaluating the NCS OPSCAN 7 scanner and the
>SCANTRON 8400 scanner. Can you share any info (pro, con) that would help us
>in our evaluation.
>
>                                           thanks
>                                           Rosie (uottawa)
The University of Alberta has been using NCS Sentry 7008's for the past
13.5 years.  There's a fair difference between these machines and their
Opscans which made me feel that I wasn't really qualified to answer
the question.  The difference also shows up in the software--apparently,
I am one of very few who is comfortable with the DOSSIER software and
who finds SCANTOOLS (even with userexits) restrictive.

Based on demos of Scantron machines and the lack of a proposal from
the Scantron sales rep for a machine which will give me the same
power as (even the restricted) flexibility of the SCANTOOLS oriented
Opscans, I would conclude that NCS continues to offer the better
product.

We have been very satisfied with the NCS equipment and are currently
anticipating acquiring a couple Opscan 10s.  The only success stories
I am aware of with respect to Scantron are those appearing on this
list--there seem to be more instances of dissatisfaction than of
satisfaction.
                                        Dan Precht
                                        University Computing Systems
                                        University of Alberta
Technical Details
Message-ID: <OMRSCAN%92020711082048@VM.UOGUELPH.CA>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!wupost!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UALTAVM.BITNET!DPRECHT

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10fb1a,8f02ed1109683c0e,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10fb1a,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-02-07 10:32:56 PST
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!wupost!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UALTAVM.BITNET!DPRECHT
Message-ID: <OMRSCAN%92020711082048@VM.UOGUELPH.CA>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.omrscan
Date:         Fri, 7 Feb 1992 08:49:44 MST
Sender:       OMR Scanner Discussion <OMRSCAN@UOGUELPH.BITNET>
From:         Dan Precht <DPRECHT@UALTAVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: NCS vs SCANTRON
In-Reply-To:  Message of Tue, 14 Jan 92 10:24:09 MST from <DPRECHT@UALTAVM>