Article View: bit.listserv.physhare
Article #1136Re: Admiistrative problem
From: Roger Key
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 1994 15:57
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 1994 15:57
66 lines
3215 bytes
3215 bytes
> > Dave > Could you send a note to those you delete? > Please and thank you. > Bruce A. Seiger > bseiger@igc.apc.org > > ------------------------------------------------------ > Hello all, > > I have good news and bad news. The good news is physhare is > prospering. > The bad news is the number of users and traffic is causing an > administrative > problem for me. We have approximately 250 members. Sometimes > people > subscribe and do not keep up with their mail. When the disk > allocation on > thier host machine is reach, physhare messages are rejected. > Every time a > message is rejected, I get the message. The listserv program > tries to > resend these messages which sends more mail to my mailbox. Then > we have > Internet nodes which go down resultingin more returned messages > to my > mailbox. I am now getting 50-100 of these messages daily. > > Starting this week I will delete users when I begin to receive > error > messages. Please don't take this as a sign you are unwelcome. > If you are > deleted for some reason, just resubscribe to the list when your > problem is > corrected. > > I'm sure you will know something is wrong if you go a week or two > without a > physhare message. > > Dave Popp > list owner > Dave, I think you're being too nice. I'm on another listserv list with over 3700 subscribers, and there it is all done automatically - deleting, I mean. It is roots-l at vm1.nodak.edu. With a list that big, auto deletions are about the only solution as I see it... no problem doing that here either, as long as all know it will happen.... they also have a nice archiving/searching/retrieving service set up for all messages that cross the list... My own opinion is that the same thing should be done for all the physics stuff, physlrnr, sais-l, phys-l, phys-stu, tap-l and so on, but I don't know the details of setting such a thing up .... just my 2 cents: ------------------------------------------------------------------- Roger Key, Demonstrations and Laboratories Kansas State University Department of Physics 9 Cardwell Hall 913-532-1629 Manhattan KS 66506-2601 FAX: 6806 rkey@phys.ksu.edu -------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<199410271557.KAA16057@dirac.phys.ksu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!PHYS.KSU.EDU!rkeyShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 16cfd8,c2f1fc1ada478f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid16cfd8,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-27 08:57:05 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!PHYS.KSU.EDU!rkey
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.physhare
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 2286
Message-ID: <199410271557.KAA16057@dirac.phys.ksu.edu>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 1994 10:57:05 -0500
Sender: Sharing resources for high school physics <PHYSHARE@PSUVM.PSU.EDU>
From: Roger Key <rkey@PHYS.KSU.EDU>
Subject: Re: Admiistrative problem
In-Reply-To: <199410271202.HAA18027@bohr.phys.ksu.edu> from "Bruce A. Seiger"
at Oct 27, 94 07:57:54 am
Lines: 65